FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533   2534   2535   2536   2537   2538   2539   2540   2541  
2542   2543   2544   2545   2546   2547   2548   2549   2550   2551   >>  
t enjoyment of man."--_Ib._, p, 100. [462] When several nominatives are connected, some authors and printers put the comma only where the conjunction is omitted. W. Day separates them all, one from an other; but after the last, when this is singular before a plural verb, he inserts no point. Example: "Imagination is one of the principal ingredients which enter into the complex idea of genius; but _judgment, memory, understanding, enthusiasm_, and _sensibility_ are also included."--_Day's Punctuation_, p. 52. If the points are to be put where the pauses naturally occur, here should be a comma after _sensibility_; and, if I mistake not, it would be more consonant with current usage to set one there. John Wilson, however, in a later work, which is for the most part a very good one, prefers the doctrine of Day, as in the following instance: "_Reputation, virtue_, and _happiness_ depend greatly on the choice of companions."--_Wilson's Treatise on Punctuation_, p. 30. [463] Some printers, and likewise some authors, suppose a series of words to require the comma, only where the conjunction is suppressed. This is certainly a great error. It gives us such punctuation as comports neither with the _sense_ of three or more words in the same construction, nor with the _pauses_ which they require in reading. "John, James and Thomas are here," is a sentence which plainly tells John that James and Thomas are here; and which, if read according to this pointing, cannot possibly have any other meaning. Yet this is the way in which the rules of _Cooper, Felton, Frost, Webster_, and perhaps others, teach us to point it, when we mean to tell somebody else that all three are here! In his pretended "Abridgment of Murray's English Grammar," (a work abounding in small thefts from Brown's Institutes,) Cooper has the following example: "John, James or Joseph intends to accompany me."--Page 120. Here, John being addressed, the punctuation is right; but, to make this noun a nominative to the verb, a comma must be put after _each of the others_. In Cooper's "Plain and Practical Grammar," the passage is found in this form: "John, James, or Joseph intends to accompany us."--Page 132. This pointing is doubly wrong; because it is adapted to neither sense. If the three nouns have the same construction, the principal pause will be immediately before the verb; and surely a comma is as much required by that pause, as by the second. See the Note on Rule 3d,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533   2534   2535   2536   2537   2538   2539   2540   2541  
2542   2543   2544   2545   2546   2547   2548   2549   2550   2551   >>  



Top keywords:

Cooper

 

construction

 

Punctuation

 

pauses

 

accompany

 
Joseph
 

Thomas

 

pointing

 

sensibility

 

require


punctuation

 

Grammar

 
Wilson
 

intends

 
authors
 

conjunction

 

principal

 
printers
 
adapted
 

reading


Webster

 

Felton

 

meaning

 

surely

 

immediately

 

plainly

 
required
 
sentence
 

possibly

 

Practical


Institutes

 

passage

 

addressed

 

nominative

 
thefts
 

pretended

 

doubly

 
abounding
 

English

 

Abridgment


Murray

 

greatly

 
complex
 

genius

 

judgment

 

Example

 

Imagination

 

ingredients

 

memory

 

understanding