FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514   2515   2516   2517   2518  
2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533   2534   2535   2536   2537   2538   2539   2540   2541   2542   2543   >>   >|  
r, that this mood should be found to "_follow_" every thing else, and _not_ "the preposition TO," which comes "_before_" it, and by which it is "_preceded_?" This author adopts also the following absurd and needless rule: "The Infinitive mode has an objective case before it _when_ [the word] THAT _is omitted_: as, I believe _the sun_ to be the centre of the solar system; I know _him_ to be a man of veracity."--_Ib._, p. 167; _Abridged Ed._, 124. (See Obs. 10th on Rule 2d, above.) "_Sun_" is here governed by "_believe_;" and "_him_," by "_know_;" and "_be_," in both instances, by "the preposition TO:" for this particle is not only "the _sign_ of the Infinitive," but its _governing word_, answering well to the definition of a preposition above cited from Weld. [411] "The infinitive is sometimes governed by a preposition; as, 'The shipmen were _about to flee_.'"--_Wells's School Gram._, 1st Ed., p. 149; 3d Ed., p. 158. Wells has altered this, and for "_preposition_" put "_adverb_."--Ed. of 1850, p. 163. [412] Some grammatists, being predetermined that no preposition shall control the infinitive, avoid the conclusion by absurdly calling FOR, a _conjunction_; ABOUT, an _adverb_; and TO--no matter what--but generally, _nothing_. Thus: "The _conjunction_ FOR, is inelegantly used before verbs in the infinitive mood; as, 'He came _for_ to study Latin.'"--_Greenleaf's Gram._, p. 38. "The infinitive mood is sometimes _governed_ by _conjunctions_ or _adverbs_; as, 'An object so high _as to be_ invisible;' 'The army is _about to march_.'"--_Kirkham's Gram._, p. 188. This is a note to that extra rule which Kirkham proposes for our use, "_if we reject the idea of government_, as applied to the verb in this mood!"--_Ib._ [413] After the word "_fare_," Murray put a semicolon, which shows that he misunderstood the mood of the verb "_hear_." It is not always necessary to repeat the particle _to_, when two or more infinitives are connected; and this fact is an other good argument against calling the preposition _to_ "a part of the verb." But in this example, and some others here exhibited, the repetition is requisite.--G. B. [414] "The Infinitive Mood is not confined to a trunk or nominative, and is always preceded by _to_, expressed or implied."--_S. Barrett's Gram._, 1854, p. 43. [415] Lindley Murray, and several of his pretended improvers, say, "The infinitive sometimes _follows_ the word AS: thus, 'An object so high _as to be_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514   2515   2516   2517   2518  
2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533   2534   2535   2536   2537   2538   2539   2540   2541   2542   2543   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

preposition

 

infinitive

 

Infinitive

 

governed

 

particle

 
adverb
 

conjunction

 

preceded

 

calling

 

Murray


Kirkham

 

object

 
semicolon
 

invisible

 
adverbs
 

Greenleaf

 

conjunctions

 
misunderstood
 
proposes
 

government


applied

 

reject

 

implied

 

Barrett

 

expressed

 

nominative

 
confined
 
improvers
 

pretended

 

Lindley


connected

 

infinitives

 

repeat

 

argument

 
exhibited
 

repetition

 

requisite

 
Abridged
 

veracity

 

centre


system

 

instances

 
omitted
 

follow

 

author

 

adopts

 

objective

 

needless

 

absurd

 

governing