FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514   2515   2516   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533  
2534   2535   2536   2537   2538   2539   2540   2541   2542   2543   2544   2545   2546   2547   2548   2549   2550   2551   >>  
ter one, into which an equally successful professor of grammar has condensed a much greater number and variety of faults,--is seen in the following citation: "The verb is so called, because it means _word_; and as there can be no sentence without it, it is called, emphatically, _the word_."--_Pinneo's Analytical Gram._, p. 14. This sentence, in which, perhaps, most readers will discover no error, has in fact faults of so many different kinds, that a critic must pause to determine under which of more than half a dozen different heads of false syntax it might most fitly be presented for correction or criticism. (1.) It might be set down under my Note 5th to Rule 10th; for, in one or two instances out of the three, if not in all, the pronoun "_it_" gives not the same idea as its antecedent. The faults coming under this head might be obviated by three changes, made thus: "The verb is so called, because _verb_ means _word_; and, as there can be no sentence without _a verb, this part of speech_ is called, emphatically, _the word_." Cobbett wisely says, "Never put an _it_ upon paper without thinking well of what you are about."--_E. Gram._, 196. But (2.) the erroneous text, and this partial correction of it too, might be put under my Critical Note 5th, among _Falsities_; for, in either form, each member affirms what is manifestly untrue. The term "_word_" has many meanings; but no usage ever makes it, "_emphatically_" or otherwise, a name for one of the classes called "parts of speech;" nor is there nowadays any current usage in which "_verb_ means _word_." (3.) This text might be put under Critical Note 6th, among _Absurdities_; for whoever will read it, as in fairness he should, taking the pronoun "_it_" in the exact sense of its antecedent "_the verb_," will see that the import of each part is absurd--the whole, a two-fold absurdity. (4.) It might be put under Critical Note 7th, among _Self-Contradictions_; for, to teach at once that "_the verb_ is _so_ called," and "is called, emphatically," _otherwise_,--namely, "_the word_,"--is, to contradict one's self. (5.) It might be set down under Critical Note 9th, among examples of _Words Needless_; for the author's question is, "Why is the verb so called?" and this may be much better answered in fewer words, thus: "THE VERB is so called, because in French it is called _le verbe_ and in Latin, _verbum_, which means _word_." (6.) It might be put under Critical Note 10th, as an exam
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514   2515   2516   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533  
2534   2535   2536   2537   2538   2539   2540   2541   2542   2543   2544   2545   2546   2547   2548   2549   2550   2551   >>  



Top keywords:

called

 

Critical

 

emphatically

 

sentence

 

faults

 
antecedent
 

pronoun

 

speech

 

correction

 

manifestly


untrue

 

meanings

 
affirms
 

classes

 
member
 

fairness

 

current

 
Absurdities
 
nowadays
 

answered


question

 

Needless

 

author

 

verbum

 

French

 

examples

 
absurdity
 
absurd
 

import

 

contradict


Contradictions

 

Falsities

 

taking

 

coming

 
critic
 

readers

 

discover

 
determine
 

syntax

 

professor


grammar

 

condensed

 
successful
 

equally

 

greater

 

number

 

Pinneo

 

Analytical

 

citation

 

variety