FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2488   2489   2490   2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512  
2513   2514   2515   2516   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533   2534   2535   2536   2537   >>   >|  
r _do_. But Lindley Murray, and his followers, have been more tractable. They were ready to be led without looking. "To," say they, "comes from _Saxon and Gothic_ words, which signify action, effect, termination, to act, &c."--_Murray's Gram._, 8vo, p. 183; _Fisk's_, 92. What an admirable explanation is this! and how prettily the great Compiler says on the next leaf: "Etymology, when it is guided by _judgment_, and [when] _proper limits_ are set to it, certainly merits great attention!"--_Ib._, p. 135. According to his own express rules for interpreting "a substantive _without any article to limit it_" and the "relative pronoun _with a comma before it_," he must have meant, that "_to_ comes from Saxon and Gothic words" _of every sort_, and that _the words of these two languages_ "signify action, effect, termination, to act, &c." The latter assertion is true enough: but, concerning the former, a man of sense may demur. Nor do I see how it is possible not to despise _such_ etymology, be the interpretation of the words what it may. For, if _to_ means _action_ or _to act_, then our little infinitive phrase, _to be_, must mean, _action be_, or _to act be_; and what is this, but nonsense? [404] So, from the following language of three modern authors, one cannot but infer, that they would parse the verb _as governed by the preposition_; but I do not perceive that they anywhere expressly say so: (1.) "The Infinitive is the form of the supplemental verb that always has, or admits, the _preposition_ TO before it; as, to _move_. Its general character is to represent the action in _prospect_, or _to do_; or in _retrospect_, as _to have done_. As a verb, it signifies _to do_ the action; and as _object of the preposition_ TO, it stands in the place of a noun for _the doing_ of it. The infinitive verb and its prefix _to_ are used much like a preposition and its noun object."--_Felch's Comprehensive Gram._, p. 62. (2.) "The action or other signification of a verb may be expressed in its widest and most general sense, without any limitation by a person or agent, but _merely as the end or purpose_ of some other action, state of being, quality, or thing; it is, from this want of limitation, said to be in the _Infinitive mode_; and is expressed by the verb with the _preposition_ TO before it, to denote _this relation of end or purpose_; as, 'He came _to see_ me;' 'The man is not fit _die_;' 'It was not right for him _to do_ thus.'"--_D
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2488   2489   2490   2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512  
2513   2514   2515   2516   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533   2534   2535   2536   2537   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

action

 

preposition

 

purpose

 

limitation

 

expressed

 
infinitive
 

Infinitive

 

object

 

general

 

effect


Murray

 

signify

 
Gothic
 

termination

 
represent
 

tractable

 

character

 
stands
 
signifies
 

prospect


retrospect

 

perceive

 

expressly

 

governed

 

admits

 

supplemental

 
followers
 
denote
 

relation

 

quality


Comprehensive

 

prefix

 

signification

 

person

 
widest
 

Lindley

 

language

 
article
 

substantive

 

admirable


explanation

 

interpreting

 
relative
 

pronoun

 

express

 

guided

 

prettily

 

judgment

 

Compiler

 

Etymology