FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2463   2464   2465   2466   2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487  
2488   2489   2490   2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   >>   >|  
in winning the approbation of committees and teachers, that it may be worth while to notice most of them here. "REM. 1.--A sentence or phrase _often supplies the place_ of a noun or pronoun in the objective case; as, 'You see _how few of these men have returned.'"--Wells' s School Gram._, "Third Thousand," p. 154; late Ed. Sec.215. According to this, must we not suppose verbs to be often transitive, when _not made so_ by the author's _definition_? And if _"see"_ is here transitive, would not other forms, such as _are told, have been told_, or _are aware_, be just as much so, if put in its place? "REM. 2.--An _intransitive_ verb may be used to _govern an objective_, when the verb and the noun depending upon it are of kindred signification; as, '_To live_ a blameless _life;'--'To run_ a _race.'"--Ib._ Here verbs are absurdly called "_intransitive_," when, both in fact and by the foregoing definition, they are clearly transitive; or, at least, are, by many teachers, supposed to be so. "REM. 3.--Idiomatic expressions sometimes occur in which _intransitive_ verbs are followed by _objectives depending upon them_; as, 'To _look_ the _subject_ fully in the face.'--_Channing_. 'They _laughed him_ to scorn.'--_Matt_. 9:24. 'And _talked_ the _night_ away.'--_Goldsmith_."-- _Ib._ Here again, verbs evidently _made transitive by the construction_, are, with strange inconsistency, called "_intransitive_." By these three remarks together, the distinction between transitives and intransitives must needs be extensively _obscured_ in the mind of the learner. "REM. 4.--Transitive verbs of _asking, giving, teaching_, and _some others_, are often employed to govern two objectives; as, '_Ask him_ his _opinion_;'--'This experience _taught me_ a valuable _lesson_.'--'_Spare me_ yet this bitter _cup.'--Hemans_. 'I thrice _presented him_ a kingly _crown_.'--_Shakspeare_."--_Ib._ This rule not only jumbles together several different constructions, such as would require different cases in Latin or Greek, but is evidently repugnant to _the sense_ of many of the passages to which it is meant to be applied. Wells thinks, the practice of supplying a preposition, "is, in many cases, arbitrary, and does violence to an important and well established _idiom_ of the language."--_Ib._ But how can any idiom be violated by a mode of parsing, which merely expounds its _true meaning_? If the dative case has the meaning of _to_, and the ablative has the me
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2463   2464   2465   2466   2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487  
2488   2489   2490   2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

intransitive

 

transitive

 

definition

 

called

 

objectives

 
evidently
 

depending

 

govern

 

meaning

 

objective


teachers

 

experience

 
bitter
 

expounds

 
lesson
 

valuable

 

opinion

 
employed
 
taught
 

teaching


transitives

 

intransitives

 

extensively

 

distinction

 

remarks

 

ablative

 
obscured
 
giving
 

Transitive

 

learner


dative

 

kingly

 

important

 

violence

 
established
 

repugnant

 

applied

 
thinks
 

practice

 

passages


arbitrary

 

preposition

 
language
 

require

 

Shakspeare

 

parsing

 

supplying

 

presented

 

Hemans

 

thrice