FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2466   2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487   2488   2489   2490  
2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514   2515   >>   >|  
c."--"Possession of the third, _the_ fourth, and _the_ fifth, _was_ taken at half past eight."--"The Pinta soon _disappeared_ in the darkness of the night." Here again, Wells puzzles his pupil, with a note which half justifies and half condemns the awkward usage in question. See _School Gram._, 1st Ed., p. 147; 3d Ed., 156; late Ed., Sec. 215. "REM. 8.--There are _some_ verbs which may be used either transitively or intransitively; as, 'He _will return_ in a week,' 'He _will return_ the book.'"--_Ib._, p. 147; 156; &c. According to Dr. Johnson, this is true of "_most_ verbs," and Lindley Murray asserts it of "_many_." There are, I think, but _few_ which may _not_, in some phraseology or other, be used both ways. Hence the rule, "Transitive verbs govern the objective case," or, as Wells now has it, "Transitive verbs, in the active voice, govern the objective case," (Sec. 215,) rests only upon a distinction which _itself creates_, between transitives and intransitives; and therefore it amounts to little. [354] To these examples, Webster adds _two others_, of a _different sort_, with a comment, thus: "'Ask _him_ his _opinion_?' 'You have asked _me_ the _news_.' Will it be said that the latter phrases are elliptical, for 'ask _of_ him his opinion?' I apprehend this to be a mistake. According to the true idea of the government of a transitive verb, _him_ must be the _object_ in the phrase under consideration, as much as in this, 'Ask _him_ for a guinea;' or in this, 'ask him to go.'"--_Ibid, ut supra_; _Frazee's Gram._, p. 152; _Fowler's_, p. 480. If, for the reason here stated, it is a "mistake" to supply _of_ in the foregoing instances, it does not follow that they are not elliptical. On the contrary, if they are analogous to, "Ask him _for_ a guinea;" or, "Ask him _to go_;" it is manifest that the construction must be this: "Ask him [_for_] his opinion;" or, "Ask him [_to tell_] his opinion." So that the question resolves itself into this: What is the best way of _supplying the ellipsis_, when two objectives thus occur after ask?--G. BROWN. [355] These examples Murray borrowed from Webster, who published them, with _references_, under his 34th Rule. With too little faith in the corrective power of grammar, the Doctor remarks upon the constructions as follows: "This idiom is outrageously anomalous, but perhaps incorrigible."-- _Webster's Philos. Gram._, p. 180; _Imp. G._, 128. [356] This seems to be a reasonable pri
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2466   2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487   2488   2489   2490  
2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514   2515   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

opinion

 

Webster

 

According

 

Transitive

 

objective

 
Murray
 

return

 

examples

 

guinea

 

elliptical


question

 

govern

 
mistake
 

phrase

 
object
 

follow

 

contrary

 
analogous
 
transitive
 

foregoing


Frazee

 

reason

 

Fowler

 

instances

 

supply

 

stated

 
consideration
 
remarks
 

Doctor

 

constructions


grammar

 

corrective

 

outrageously

 

anomalous

 
reasonable
 

incorrigible

 

Philos

 
supplying
 

ellipsis

 

construction


resolves

 

objectives

 
government
 

published

 

references

 

borrowed

 

manifest

 

School

 

condemns

 

awkward