FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622  
623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   >>   >|  
ill adds that he cannot but think that Yule overlooked the existence of Togto when he identified Kwei-hwa Ch'eng with Tenduc. Tou Ch'eng is two days' march west of Kwei-hwa Ch'eng, "On the loess hill behind this place are the ruins of a large camp, Orch'eng, in all likelihood the site of the old town" (l.c. 18). M. Bonin (_J. As._ XV. 1900, 589) shares Mr. Rockhill's opinion. From Kwei-hwa Ch'eng, M. Bonin went by the valley of the Hei Shui River to the Hwang Ho; at the junction of the two rivers stands the village of Ho-k'au (Ho-k'ou) south of the small town To Ch'eng, surmounted by the ruins of the old square Mongol stronghold of Tokto, the walls of which are still in a good state of preservation.--(_La Geographie_, I. 1901, p. 116.) On the other hand, it is but fair to state that Palladius (21) says: "The name of Tenduc obviously corresponds to T'ien-te Kiun, a military post, the position of which Chinese geographers identify correctly with that of the modern Kuku-hoton (_Ta tsing y t'ung chi_, ch. on the Tumots of Kuku-hoton). The T'ien-te Kiun post existed under this name during the K'itan (Liao) and Kin Dynasties up to Khubilai's time (1267); when under the name of Fung-chow it was left only a district town in the department of Ta-t'ung fu. The Kin kept in T'ien-te Kiun a military chief, _Chao-t'ao- shi_, whose duty it was to keep an eye on the neighbouring tribes, and to use, if needed, military force against them. The T'ien-te Kiun district was hardly greater in extent than the modern aimak of Tumot, into which Kuku-hoton was included since the 16th century, i.e. 370 _li_ from north to south, and 400 _li_ from east to west; during the Kin it had a settled population, numbering 22,600 families." In a footnote, Palladius refers to the geographical parts of the _Liao shi, Kin shi_, and _Yuen shi_, and adds: "M. Polo's commentators are wrong in suspecting an anachronism in his statement, or trying to find Tenduc elsewhere." We find in the _North-China Herald_ (29th April, 1887, p. 474) the following note from the _Chinese Times_: "There are records that the position of this city [Kwei-hwa Ch'eng] was known to the builder of the Great Wall. From very remote times, it appears to have been a settlement of nomadic tribes. During the last 1000 years it has been alternately possessed by the Mongols and Chinese. About A.D. 1573, Emperor Wan-Li reclaimed it, enclosed a space within walls, and called it Kwei-hwa Ch'eng.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622  
623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

military

 

Chinese

 

Tenduc

 
tribes
 

modern

 

position

 
district
 

Palladius

 

families

 
needed

neighbouring

 

numbering

 

population

 

included

 

greater

 

extent

 

century

 

settled

 

During

 

nomadic


settlement

 

remote

 

appears

 

alternately

 

possessed

 

reclaimed

 

enclosed

 

called

 
Emperor
 

Mongols


builder
 
anachronism
 
suspecting
 

statement

 

commentators

 

refers

 

footnote

 

geographical

 

records

 

Herald


Rockhill

 

opinion

 

valley

 

shares

 

village

 

stands

 

rivers

 

junction

 

identified

 
existence