FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365  
366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   >>   >|  
uch an order as of course within twelve months of delivery. After expiry of that time the court may order taxation if the special circumstances call for it, and even so late as twelve months after actual payment. Costs as between solicitor and client are taxed in the same office as litigious costs, and objections to the decisions of the taxing officer, if properly made, can be taken for review to a judge of the High Court and to the Court of Appeal. _Litigious Costs._--The expenses of litigation fall in the first instance on the person who undertakes the proceedings or retains and employs the lawyer. It is in accordance with the ordinary ideas of justice that the expenses of the successful party to litigation should be defrayed by the unsuccessful party, a notion expressed in the phrase that "costs follow the event." But there are many special circumstances which interfere to modify the application of this rule. The action, though successful, may be in its nature frivolous or vexatious, or it may have been brought in a higher court where a lower court would have been competent to deal with it. On the other hand the defendant, although he has escaped a judgment against him, may by his conduct have rendered the action necessary or otherwise justifiable. In such cases the rule that costs should follow the event would be felt to work an injustice, and exceptions to its operation have therefore been devised. In the law of England the provisions as to litigious costs, though now simpler than of old, are still elaborate and complicated, and the costs themselves are on a higher scale than is known in most other countries. Except as regards appeals to the House of Lords and suits in equity, the right to recover costs from the opposite party in litigation has always depended on statute law or on rules made under statutory authority, "Costs are the creature of statute." The House of Lords has declared its competence to grant costs on appeals independently of statute. In the judicial committee of the privy council the power to award, in its discretion, costs on appeals from the colonies or other matters referred to it, is given by S 15 of the Judicial Committee Act 1833; and the costs are taxed by the registrar of the council. Courts of equity have always claimed a discretion independently of statute to give or refuse costs, but as a general rule the maxim of the civil law, _victus victori in expensis condemnatus est_, was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365  
366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

statute

 

litigation

 
appeals
 

discretion

 

council

 
equity
 
independently
 
follow
 

successful

 

action


expenses
 

higher

 

months

 
special
 
circumstances
 
twelve
 
litigious
 

justifiable

 

exceptions

 
Except

injustice

 

provisions

 

simpler

 

complicated

 

elaborate

 
England
 

devised

 

operation

 

countries

 

competence


registrar

 

Courts

 
claimed
 

Judicial

 

Committee

 

refuse

 

expensis

 
condemnatus
 

victori

 

victus


general

 

statutory

 

authority

 

creature

 

depended

 
recover
 
opposite
 

declared

 

colonies

 

matters