FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236  
237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>  
strategical problem. It may be taken as a general rule that no question of grand strategy can be decided apart from diplomacy, and vice versa. For a line of action or an object which is expedient from the point of view of strategy may be barred by diplomatic considerations, and vice versa. To decide a question of grand strategy without consideration of its diplomatic aspect, is to decide on half the factors only. Neither strategy or diplomacy has ever a clean slate. This interaction has to be accepted by commanding officers as part of the inevitable "friction of war." A good example is Pitt's refusal to send a fleet into the Baltic to assist Frederick the Great during the Seven Years War, for fear of compromising our relations with the Scandinavian Powers. Minor Strategy has for its province the plans of operations. It deals with-- (1) The selection of the "objectives," that is, the particular forces of the enemy or the strategical points to be dealt with in order to secure the object of the particular operation. (2) The directing of the force assigned for the operation. Minor Strategy may be of three kinds:-- (1) Naval, where the immediate object is to be attained by a fleet only. (2) Military, where the immediate object is to be attained by an army only. (3) Combined, where the immediate object is to be attained by army and navy together. NOTE.--It will be seen that what is usually called Naval Strategy or Fleet Strategy, is only a sub-division of a division of strategy, and that, therefore, strategy cannot be studied from the point of view of naval operations only. NOTE.--Naval Strategy, being only a part of General Strategy, is subject to the same friction as Major Strategy, though in a less degree. Individual commanders have often to take a decision independently of the central government, or headquarters; they should, therefore, always keep in mind the possible ulterior effects of any line of action they may take, endeavouring to be sure that what is strategically expedient is not diplomatically inexpedient. EXAMPLE.--Boscawen's attack on De la Motte on the eve of the Seven Years War. NATURE OF OBJECT The solution of every strategical problem, whether of Major or Minor Strategy, depends primarily on the nature of the object in view. All ob
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236  
237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>  



Top keywords:
Strategy
 

object

 

strategy

 

strategical

 

attained

 

division

 

operation

 

operations

 

friction

 
expedient

action

 

question

 

diplomacy

 

problem

 

decide

 

diplomatic

 

Individual

 
degree
 
called
 
commanders

General

 

subject

 

studied

 

effects

 

NATURE

 

EXAMPLE

 

Boscawen

 

attack

 
OBJECT
 

nature


primarily
 
depends
 

solution

 
inexpedient
 
diplomatically
 
headquarters
 

government

 

central

 
decision
 
independently

strategically
 

endeavouring

 

ulterior

 
interaction
 
factors
 

Neither

 

accepted

 

commanding

 

officers

 

inevitable