FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>  
it may be a primary or immediate object, and even the ulterior object of particular operations. PROOF II.--_Inductive_, from history or past experience.--History shows that the actual functions of the Fleet (except in purely maritime wars) have been threefold. 1. The prevention or securing of alliances (_i.e._, deterring or persuading neutrals as to participating in the war). EXAMPLES.--The operations of Rooke in the first years of the War of the Spanish Succession, 1702-04, to secure the adhesion of Savoy and Portugal to the Grand Alliance. Operations of Nelson to maintain the alliance of the Kingdom of Naples. In the first case there came a crisis when it was more important to demonstrate to Savoy and Portugal what they stood to lose by joining Louis XIV than to act immediately against the Toulon Fleet. In the second, the Neapolitan Alliance was essential to our operations in the Eastern Mediterranean; the destruction of the Toulon Fleet was not. 2. The protection or destruction of commerce. 3. The furtherance or hindrance of military operations ashore. NOTE.--The above is the best working "Definition of Naval Strategy," as emphasising its intimate connection with diplomatic, financial, and military aspects of major strategy. These functions may be discharged in two ways:-- (1) By direct territorial attacks, threatened or performed (bombardment, landing, raiding parties, &c). (2) By getting command of the sea, _i.e._, establishing ourselves in such a position that we can control the maritime communications of all parties concerned, so that we can operate by sea against their territory, commerce, and allies, and they cannot operate against ours. NOTE.--The power of the second method, by controlling communications, is out of all proportion to the first--direct attack. Indeed, the first can seldom be performed with any serious effect without the second. Thus, from this point of view also, it is clear that Naval Strategy is mainly a question of communications. But not entirely. Circumstances have arisen when the Fleet must discharge part of its function by direct action before there is time to get general control of the communications. (That is, political and military considerations may deflect normal operation of Naval Strategy.) EXAMPLE.--Rooke's capture of Gibraltar in 1704, in the face
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>  



Top keywords:
operations
 

communications

 

military

 

Strategy

 

direct

 

Alliance

 

Portugal

 

operate

 

parties

 
commerce

control

 

Toulon

 

destruction

 

performed

 

object

 

functions

 

maritime

 
primary
 
concerned
 
territory

method

 

proportion

 

allies

 

controlling

 

landing

 

raiding

 

bombardment

 

Inductive

 
territorial
 

attacks


threatened
 
position
 

ulterior

 
command
 
establishing
 
attack
 

general

 

political

 
function
 
action

considerations
 

deflect

 

Gibraltar

 
capture
 
normal
 

operation

 

EXAMPLE

 

discharge

 

effect

 

seldom