FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246  
247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>  
successful actions. 2. _Local and temporary control_ may be secured by:-- (a) A defensive action not necessarily entirely successful (containing). (b) Forcing concentration on the enemy elsewhere (diversion). (c) Superior concentration so as to render impotent the enemy's force available in the special theatre of operations (masking or containing). BLOCKADE Blockades are of two natures, according to the object review. The object may be:-- (d) Blockade. i. _Close blockade_ to prevent the enemy putting to sea. The object being usually to secure local or temporary control. ii. _Observation blockade_, to force the enemy to put to sea _by occupying the common lines of communications_ (_see_ below). In this case you are seeking a decision as a step towards general control. Both natures are operations upon the lines of passage and communication, but in case (1) the primary intention is defensive, to secure our own line; in case (2) the primary intention is offensive, to seize the enemy's line and compel him to expose himself in an attempt to recover it. GENERAL RULES FOR CONDUCTING BLOCKADES In case (1) (defensive intention) blockade should be as close as is compatible with security from torpedo attack. In case (2) (offensive intention) it should be as distant as is compatible with bringing enemy to action if he comes out. Examples:--_Case_ (1): First stage of Togo's blockade of Port Arthur. _Case_ (2): Nelson off Toulon. _Confusion of the two_: Sampson's attempt to close Santiago simultaneously with an attempt to force Cervera to sea. THE PECULIARITY OF MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS Since the whole idea of command of the sea and the whole theory of blockade rest on the control of communications, neither can be fully apprehended without a thorough understanding of the nature of maritime communications. Ashore, the respective lines of communications of each belligerent tend to run more or less approximately in opposite directions, until they meet in the theatre of operations or the objective point. At sea the reverse is the case; for in maritime warfare the great lines of communications of either belligerent tend to run approximately parallel, if, indeed, they are not identical. Thus, in the case of a war with Germany, the object of which lay in the Eastern Mediterranean, or in America, or South Africa, our respective lines of communica
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246  
247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>  



Top keywords:
blockade
 

communications

 

control

 

intention

 

object

 

defensive

 

attempt

 

operations

 

natures

 
maritime

successful

 

primary

 

offensive

 

secure

 

belligerent

 

respective

 

approximately

 
compatible
 
concentration
 
temporary

action

 

theatre

 

command

 

Cervera

 

Toulon

 

Confusion

 

Sampson

 

Santiago

 
simultaneously
 

PECULIARITY


Nelson
 
Arthur
 

theory

 
MARITIME
 
COMMUNICATIONS
 
parallel
 

warfare

 

reverse

 
Eastern
 
Mediterranean

Germany
 

identical

 

objective

 
communica
 
understanding
 

apprehended

 

nature

 

Africa

 

opposite

 

directions