FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247  
248   249   250   251   252   253   >>  
tion would be identical. This was also the case in all our imperial wars with France. _This peculiarity is the controlling influence of maritime warfare._ Nearly all our current maxims of Naval strategy can be traced to the pressure it exerts on Naval thought. It is at the root of the fundamental difference between Military and Naval strategy, and affords the explanation of much strategical error and confusion, which has arisen from applying the principles of land warfare to the sea without allowing for the antagonistic conditions of the communications and operations against them in each case. On land the chief reason for not always striking the enemy's communications at once is that as a rule we cannot do so without exposing our own. At sea, on the contrary, since the great lines are common to both, we cannot defend our own without striking at the enemy's. Therefore, at sea, the obvious opening is to get your fleet into such a position that it controls the common lines, unless defeated or evaded. EXAMPLE.--This was usually done in our old wars with France, by our getting a fleet off Brest before the French could sail. Hence the maxim "that the proper place for our fleets is off the enemy's coast," "the enemy's coast is our true frontier," and the like. But these maxims are not universally true, witness Togo's strategy against Rojesvensky, when he remained correctly upon his own coast. Take again the maxim that the primary object of the fleet is to seek out the enemy's fleet and destroy it. Here again Togo's practice was the reverse of the maxim. The true maxim is "The primary object of the fleet is to secure communications, and if the enemy's fleet is in a position to render them unsafe it must be put out of action." The enemy's fleet usually is in this position, but not always. EXAMPLE.--Opening of War of Spanish Succession. The operations of 1702 were to secure some point (Cadiz, Gibraltar, or Ferrol) on the Spanish trade communications, the French lateral communications, and our own lines of passage to the Mediterranean, where was to be our chief theatre of operation. These last two lines were identical. 1703.--Chief operations had for their object to secure the alliance of Savoy, and particularly of Portugal, and with same object in view, Rooke's official instructions directed that the French fleet was to be ignored unless it threatened our com
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247  
248   249   250   251   252   253   >>  



Top keywords:
communications
 

object

 

secure

 

operations

 

strategy

 

position

 

French

 

EXAMPLE

 

striking

 
common

primary

 

Spanish

 

France

 

maxims

 

identical

 

warfare

 

instructions

 
practice
 
Portugal
 
official

destroy

 

directed

 

threatened

 

frontier

 

universally

 

witness

 

remained

 

correctly

 
Rojesvensky
 

Opening


passage
 
Mediterranean
 

theatre

 
lateral
 
Succession
 
Ferrol
 

Gibraltar

 

operation

 
render
 
unsafe

alliance
 

action

 

reverse

 
strategical
 
explanation
 

affords

 

difference

 

Military

 

confusion

 

principles