FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239  
240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>  
wn. They should, therefore, be small. The nearer they approach the importance of a real attack the less likely they are to divert a force greater than their own. It is only their power of diverting or containing a larger force than their own that justifies the breach of the law of concentration which they involve. This power depends mainly on suddenness and mobility, and these qualities are most highly developed in combined expeditions. NOTE.--_Diversions_ must be carefully distinguished from _eccentric attacks_. _Eccentric attacks_ are true offensive movements. They have a positive object, _i.e._, they aim to acquire something from the enemy; whereas diversions have a negative object, _i.e._, they aim at preventing the enemy doing or acquiring something. Being in the category of the weaker form of war, eccentric attacks are usually made in greater force than diversions. EXAMPLES.--_Diversion._--Our raid on Washington in 1815. Landing force, about 4,000 men. Object, according to official instructions, "a diversion on the coasts of United States of America in favour of the army employed in the defence of Canada"; _i.e._, the intention was negative--preventative--defensive. 2. _Eccentric Attack._--Operations against New Orleans in 1815. Intended force 15,000 to 20,000 men. Object, "to obtain command of embouchure of the Mississippi, and, secondly, to occupy some important and valuable possession, by the restoration of which the conditions of peace might be improved, &c."; _i.e._, the intention was positive--to acquire. Compare Rochefort Expedition (diversion) and Belleisle (eccentric attack) in the Seven Years War. Note 2.--This distinction gives a threefold classification of combined expeditions, as used by Elizabethan strategists. Raids = Diversions. Incursions = Eccentric attacks. Invasions = True direct offence. Compare these with Sir John Ardagh's classification (Report of Royal Commission on Reserve Forces, 1904):-- "Raids," not exceeding 10,000 men. "Small expeditions," not exceeding 50,000 men. "Dangerous invasion," not exceeding 150,000 men. NATURE OF ULTERIOR OBJECT From the nature of the ulterior object we get an important classification of wars, according to whether such object is _limited_ or _unlimited_. (1) War with _limited object_ ("limi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239  
240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>  



Top keywords:
object
 

attacks

 

eccentric

 

classification

 

Eccentric

 

expeditions

 

exceeding

 

Diversions

 

limited

 
greater

Object

 

attack

 

Compare

 

diversions

 

negative

 

acquire

 

positive

 
combined
 
important
 
diversion

intention

 

command

 

obtain

 

valuable

 

threefold

 

distinction

 

conditions

 

improved

 
Expedition
 

Belleisle


Rochefort
 
occupy
 

restoration

 
Mississippi
 
embouchure
 
possession
 

OBJECT

 

nature

 
ULTERIOR
 
invasion

NATURE
 

ulterior

 

unlimited

 
Dangerous
 
offence
 

direct

 

strategists

 

Incursions

 

Invasions

 

Ardagh