FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573  
574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   >>   >|  
cles) In due sequence we must consider judgment, under which head there are six points of inquiry: (1) Whether judgment is an act of justice? (2) Whether it is lawful to judge? (3) Whether judgment should be based on suspicions? (4) Whether doubts should be interpreted favorably? (5) Whether judgment should always be given according to the written law? (6) Whether judgment is perverted by being usurped? _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 60, Art. 1] Whether Judgment Is an Act of Justice? Objection 1: It would seem that judgment is not an act of justice. The Philosopher says (Ethic. i, 3) that "everyone judges well of what he knows," so that judgment would seem to belong to the cognitive faculty. Now the cognitive faculty is perfected by prudence. Therefore judgment belongs to prudence rather than to justice, which is in the will, as stated above (Q. 58, A. 4). Obj. 2: Further, the Apostle says (1 Cor. 2:15): "The spiritual man judgeth all things." Now man is made spiritual chiefly by the virtue of charity, which "is poured forth in our hearts by the Holy Ghost Who is given to us" (Rom. 5:5). Therefore judgment belongs to charity rather than to justice. Obj. 3: Further, it belongs to every virtue to judge aright of its proper matter, because "the virtuous man is the rule and measure in everything," according to the Philosopher (Ethic. iii, 4). Therefore judgment does not belong to justice any more than to the other moral virtues. Obj. 4: Further, judgment would seem to belong only to judges. But the act of justice is to be found in every just man. Since then judges are not the only just men, it seems that judgment is not the proper act of justice. _On the contrary,_ It is written (Ps. 93:15): "Until justice be turned into judgment." _I answer that,_ Judgment properly denotes the act of a judge as such. Now a judge (_judex_) is so called because he asserts the right (_jus dicens_) and right is the object of justice, as stated above (Q. 57, A. 1). Consequently the original meaning of the word "judgment" is a statement or decision of the just or right. Now to decide rightly about virtuous deeds proceeds, properly speaking, from the virtuous habit; thus a chaste person decides rightly about matters relating to chastity. Therefore judgment, which denotes a right decision about what is just, belongs properly to justice. For this reason the Philosopher says (Ethic. v, 4) that "
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573  
574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

judgment

 

justice

 

Whether

 

belongs

 

Therefore

 

belong

 
Philosopher
 
Further
 

properly

 

judges


virtuous

 
cognitive
 

prudence

 

faculty

 
charity
 

denotes

 

rightly

 
decision
 

proper

 

stated


spiritual

 

virtue

 

Judgment

 
written
 

answer

 
asserts
 

called

 

turned

 

contrary

 

virtues


Consequently

 

person

 

decides

 

chaste

 

matters

 

relating

 

reason

 

chastity

 

speaking

 

proceeds


meaning
 

original

 

object

 

statement

 

sequence

 

decide

 

dicens

 

perverted

 

interpreted

 

doubts