FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615  
616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   >>   >|  
Lord commanded them to forbear from uprooting the cockle in order to spare the wheat, i.e. the good. This occurs when the wicked cannot be slain without the good being killed with them, either because the wicked lie hidden among the good, or because they have many followers, so that they cannot be killed without danger to the good, as Augustine says (Contra Parmen. iii, 2). Wherefore our Lord teaches that we should rather allow the wicked to live, and that vengeance is to be delayed until the last judgment, rather than that the good be put to death together with the wicked. When, however, the good incur no danger, but rather are protected and saved by the slaying of the wicked, then the latter may be lawfully put to death. Reply Obj. 2: According to the order of His wisdom, God sometimes slays sinners forthwith in order to deliver the good, whereas sometimes He allows them time to repent, according as He knows what is expedient for His elect. This also does human justice imitate according to its powers; for it puts to death those who are dangerous to others, while it allows time for repentance to those who sin without grievously harming others. Reply Obj. 3: By sinning man departs from the order of reason, and consequently falls away from the dignity of his manhood, in so far as he is naturally free, and exists for himself, and he falls into the slavish state of the beasts, by being disposed of according as he is useful to others. This is expressed in Ps. 48:21: "Man, when he was in honor, did not understand; he hath been compared to senseless beasts, and made like to them," and Prov. 11:29: "The fool shall serve the wise." Hence, although it be evil in itself to kill a man so long as he preserve his dignity, yet it may be good to kill a man who has sinned, even as it is to kill a beast. For a bad man is worse than a beast, and is more harmful, as the Philosopher states (Polit. i, 1 and _Ethic._ vii, 6). _______________________ THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 64, Art. 3] Whether It Is Lawful for a Private Individual to Kill a Man Who Has Sinned? Objection 1: It would seem lawful for a private individual to kill a man who has sinned. For nothing unlawful is commanded in the Divine law. Yet, on account of the sin of the molten calf, Moses commanded (Ex. 32:27): "Let every man kill his brother, and friend, and neighbor." Therefore it is lawful for private individuals to kill a sinner. Obj. 2: Further, as stated ab
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615  
616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

wicked

 

commanded

 

dignity

 

private

 

lawful

 

sinned

 
beasts
 
killed
 

danger

 

occurs


preserve

 
states
 

Philosopher

 

harmful

 
senseless
 

compared

 

understand

 
ARTICLE
 

molten

 

account


sinner

 

Further

 

stated

 
individuals
 

Therefore

 
brother
 

friend

 

neighbor

 

Divine

 

unlawful


uprooting

 

Lawful

 

Private

 

Whether

 

cockle

 

Individual

 

forbear

 

individual

 

Objection

 

Sinned


Contra
 

sinners

 

wisdom

 

Parmen

 

Wherefore

 

According

 

forthwith

 

deliver

 

expedient

 

followers