FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633  
634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   >>   >|  
a mortal sin? (7) Whether it is lawful to thieve in a case of necessity? (8) Whether every robbery is a mortal sin? (9) Whether robbery is a more grievous sin than theft? _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 66, Art. 1] Whether It Is Natural for Man to Possess External Things? Objection 1: It would seem that it is not natural for man to possess external things. For no man should ascribe to himself that which is God's. Now the dominion over all creatures is proper to God, according to Ps. 23:1, "The earth is the Lord's," etc. Therefore it is not natural for man to possess external things. Obj. 2: Further, Basil in expounding the words of the rich man (Luke 12:18), "I will gather all things that are grown to me, and my goods," says [*Hom. in Luc. xii, 18]: "Tell me: which are thine? where did you take them from and bring them into being?" Now whatever man possesses naturally, he can fittingly call his own. Therefore man does not naturally possess external things. Obj. 3: Further, according to Ambrose (De Trin. i [*De Fide, ad Gratianum, i, 1]) "dominion denotes power." But man has no power over external things, since he can work no change in their nature. Therefore the possession of external things is not natural to man. _On the contrary,_ It is written (Ps. 8:8): "Thou hast subjected all things under his feet." _I answer that,_ External things can be considered in two ways. First, as regards their nature, and this is not subject to the power of man, but only to the power of God Whose mere will all things obey. Secondly, as regards their use, and in this way, man has a natural dominion over external things, because, by his reason and will, he is able to use them for his own profit, as they were made on his account: for the imperfect is always for the sake of the perfect, as stated above (Q. 64, A. 1). It is by this argument that the Philosopher proves (Polit. i, 3) that the possession of external things is natural to man. Moreover, this natural dominion of man over other creatures, which is competent to man in respect of his reason wherein God's image resides, is shown forth in man's creation (Gen. 1:26) by the words: "Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea," etc. Reply Obj. 1: God has sovereign dominion over all things: and He, according to His providence, directed certain things to the sustenance of man's body. For this reason
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633  
634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

things

 

external

 

dominion

 

natural

 

Whether

 

reason

 
Therefore
 
possess
 

nature

 

robbery


creatures

 
naturally
 

Further

 

possession

 
External
 

mortal

 

profit

 
subjected
 

subject

 

considered


Secondly

 

answer

 

likeness

 
fishes
 

directed

 
sustenance
 

providence

 

sovereign

 

creation

 

argument


stated

 

perfect

 

imperfect

 

Philosopher

 

proves

 

resides

 

respect

 

competent

 

Moreover

 

account


ascribe
 

proper

 

Things

 

Objection

 

expounding

 

Possess

 

necessity

 

lawful

 

thieve

 

grievous