FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638  
639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   >>   >|  
Wherefore theft and robbery derive their sinful nature, through the taking being involuntary on the part of the person from whom something is taken. Now the involuntary is twofold, namely, through violence and through ignorance, as stated in _Ethic._ iii, 1. Therefore the sinful aspect of robbery differs from that of theft: and consequently they differ specifically. Reply Obj. 1: In the other kinds of sin the sinful nature is not derived from something involuntary, as in the sins opposed to justice: and so where there is a different kind of involuntary, there is a different species of sin. Reply Obj. 2: The remote end of robbery and theft is the same. But this is not enough for identity of species, because there is a difference of proximate ends, since the robber wishes to take a thing by his own power, but the thief, by cunning. Reply Obj. 3: The robbery of a woman cannot be secret on the part of the woman who is taken: wherefore even if it be secret as regards the others from whom she is taken, the nature of robbery remains on the part of the woman to whom violence is done. _______________________ FIFTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 66, Art. 5] Whether Theft Is Always a Sin? Objection 1: It would seem that theft is not always a sin. For no sin is commanded by God, since it is written (Ecclus. 15:21): "He hath commanded no man to do wickedly." Yet we find that God commanded theft, for it is written (Ex. 12:35, 36): "And the children of Israel did as the Lord had commanded Moses [Vulg.: 'as Moses had commanded']. . . and they stripped the Egyptians." Therefore theft is not always a sin. Obj. 2: Further, if a man finds a thing that is not his and takes it, he seems to commit a theft, for he takes another's property. Yet this seems lawful according to natural equity, as the jurists hold. [*See loc. cit. in Reply.] Therefore it seems that theft is not always a sin. Obj. 3: Further, he that takes what is his own does not seem to sin, because he does not act against justice, since he does not destroy its equality. Yet a man commits a theft even if he secretly take his own property that is detained by or in the safe-keeping of another. Therefore it seems that theft is not always a sin. _On the contrary,_ It is written (Ex. 20:15): "Thou shalt not steal." _I answer that,_ If anyone consider what is meant by theft, he will find that it is sinful on two counts. First, because of its opposition to justice, which gi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638  
639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

commanded

 

robbery

 

sinful

 

Therefore

 

involuntary

 

written

 
justice
 
nature
 

Further

 

species


violence

 
secret
 

property

 

commit

 
children
 

wickedly

 

Israel

 
stripped
 

Egyptians

 

answer


contrary

 

opposition

 

counts

 
keeping
 

jurists

 
equity
 

lawful

 

natural

 

detained

 

secretly


commits

 

destroy

 

equality

 

derived

 

opposed

 

specifically

 

identity

 

remote

 

differ

 

person


taking
 

Wherefore

 

derive

 

twofold

 

aspect

 

differs

 

ignorance

 

stated

 

difference

 

proximate