FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688  
689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   >>   >|  
reviler injuring a man's honor, the backbiter injuring his good name. Reply Obj. 1: In involuntary commutations, to which are reduced all injuries inflicted on our neighbor, whether by word or by deed, the kind of sin is differentiated by the circumstances "secretly" and "openly," because involuntariness itself is diversified by violence and by ignorance, as stated above (Q. 65, A. 4; I-II, Q. 6, AA. 5, 8). Reply Obj. 2: The words of a backbiter are said to be secret, not altogether, but in relation to the person of whom they are said, because they are uttered in his absence and without his knowledge. On the other hand, the reviler speaks against a man to his face. Wherefore if a man speaks ill of another in the presence of several, it is a case of backbiting if he be absent, but of reviling if he alone be present: although if a man speak ill of an absent person to one man alone, he destroys his good name not altogether but partly. Reply Obj. 3: A man is said to backbite (_detrahere_) another, not because he detracts from the truth, but because he lessens his good name. This is done sometimes directly, sometimes indirectly. Directly, in four ways: first, by saying that which is false about him; secondly, by stating his sin to be greater than it is; thirdly, by revealing something unknown about him; fourthly, by ascribing his good deeds to a bad intention. Indirectly, this is done either by gainsaying his good, or by maliciously concealing it, or by diminishing it. _______________________ SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 73, Art. 2] Whether Backbiting Is a Mortal Sin? Objection 1: It would seem that backbiting is not a mortal sin. For no act of virtue is a mortal sin. Now, to reveal an unknown sin, which pertains to backbiting, as stated above (A. 1, ad 3), is an act of the virtue of charity, whereby a man denounces his brother's sin in order that he may amend: or else it is an act of justice, whereby a man accuses his brother. Therefore backbiting is not a mortal sin. Obj. 2: Further, a gloss on Prov. 24:21, "Have nothing to do with detractors," says: "The whole human race is in peril from this vice." But no mortal sin is to be found in the whole of mankind, since many refrain from mortal sin: whereas they are venial sins that are found in all. Therefore backbiting is a venial sin. Obj. 3: Further, Augustine in a homily _on the Fire of Purgatory_ [*Serm. civ in the appendix to St. Augustine's work] reckons i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688  
689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

mortal

 

backbiting

 

speaks

 

virtue

 

altogether

 

backbiter

 
reviler
 
Further
 

unknown

 

person


brother

 
injuring
 

absent

 

venial

 
Therefore
 

stated

 

Augustine

 
intention
 

reveal

 

pertains


Indirectly

 

Backbiting

 

Mortal

 
Whether
 

ARTICLE

 
diminishing
 

Objection

 

SECOND

 

gainsaying

 

concealing


maliciously

 

refrain

 

mankind

 

appendix

 

reckons

 

homily

 

Purgatory

 

justice

 

accuses

 

denounces


detractors
 

charity

 

backbite

 

diversified

 

violence

 

ignorance

 

absence

 

knowledge

 

uttered

 

secret