FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709  
710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   >>   >|  
n to be made, for instance if a man be deceived in regard to more than half the amount of the just price of a thing [*Cod. IV, xliv, De Rescind. Vend. 2, 8]. On the other hand the Divine law leaves nothing unpunished that is contrary to virtue. Hence, according to the Divine law, it is reckoned unlawful if the equality of justice be not observed in buying and selling: and he who has received more than he ought must make compensation to him that has suffered loss, if the loss be considerable. I add this condition, because the just price of things is not fixed with mathematical precision, but depends on a kind of estimate, so that a slight addition or subtraction would not seem to destroy the equality of justice. Reply Obj. 2: As Augustine says "this jester, either by looking into himself or by his experience of others, thought that all men are inclined to wish to buy for a song and sell at a premium. But since in reality this is wicked, it is in every man's power to acquire that justice whereby he may resist and overcome this inclination." And then he gives the example of a man who gave the just price for a book to a man who through ignorance asked a low price for it. Hence it is evident that this common desire is not from nature but from vice, wherefore it is common to many who walk along the broad road of sin. Reply Obj. 3: In commutative justice we consider chiefly real equality. On the other hand, in friendship based on utility we consider equality of usefulness, so that the recompense should depend on the usefulness accruing, whereas in buying it should be equal to the thing bought. _______________________ SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 77, Art. 2] Whether a Sale Is Rendered Unlawful Through a Fault in the Thing Sold? Objection 1: It would seem that a sale is not rendered unjust and unlawful through a fault in the thing sold. For less account should be taken of the other parts of a thing than of what belongs to its substance. Yet the sale of a thing does not seem to be rendered unlawful through a fault in its substance: for instance, if a man sell instead of the real metal, silver or gold produced by some chemical process, which is adapted to all the human uses for which silver and gold are necessary, for instance in the making of vessels and the like. Much less therefore will it be an unlawful sale if the thing be defective in other ways. Obj. 2: Further, any fault in the thing, affecting the quantity,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709  
710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

unlawful

 

justice

 

equality

 

instance

 

common

 

silver

 
substance
 
usefulness
 

rendered

 

Divine


buying

 
nature
 

accruing

 

depend

 
wherefore
 

bought

 

ARTICLE

 
vessels
 

making

 

recompense


SECOND

 

commutative

 

Further

 
friendship
 

utility

 
defective
 

chiefly

 

desire

 

account

 

affecting


chemical

 

belongs

 

produced

 

quantity

 

process

 

unjust

 

Unlawful

 

Through

 

Rendered

 

Whether


adapted
 

Objection

 

premium

 

suffered

 

considerable

 

compensation

 

received

 

condition

 

depends

 

estimate