FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605  
606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   >>   >|  
sed from making restitution if he is altogether unable to make it. He is, however, bound either himself or through another to ask the person to whom he owes compensation to grant him a remission or a respite. Reply Obj. 3: Whenever the omission of a circumstance is contrary to virtue that circumstance must be looked upon as determinate, and we are bound to observe it: and since delay of restitution involves a sin of unjust detention which is opposed to just detention, it stands to reason that the time is determinate in the point of restitution being immediate. _______________________ QUESTION 63 OF RESPECT OF PERSONS (In Four Articles) We must now consider the vices opposed to the aforesaid parts of justice. First we shall consider respect of persons which is opposed to distributive justice; secondly we shall consider the vices opposed to commutative justice. Under the first head there are four points of inquiry: (1) Whether respect of persons is a sin? (2) Whether it takes place in the dispensation of spiritualities? (3) Whether it takes place in showing honor? (4) Whether it takes place in judicial sentences? _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 63, Art. 1] Whether Respect of Persons Is a Sin? Objection 1: It would seem that respect of persons is not a sin. For the word "person" includes a reference to personal dignity [*Cf. I, Q. 29, A. 3, ad 2]. Now it belongs to distributive justice to consider personal dignity. Therefore respect of persons is not a sin. Obj. 2: Further, in human affairs persons are of more importance than things, since things are for the benefit of persons and not conversely. But respect of things is not a sin. Much less, therefore, is respect of persons. Obj. 3: Further, no injustice or sin can be in God. Yet God seems to respect persons, since of two men circumstanced alike He sometimes upraises one by grace, and leaves the other in sin, according to Matt. 24:40: "Two shall be in a bed [Vulg.: 'field'] [*'Bed' is the reading of Luke 17:34], one shall be taken, and one shall be left." Therefore respect of persons is not a sin. _On the contrary,_ Nothing but sin is forbidden in the Divine law. Now respect of persons is forbidden, Deut. 1:17: "Neither shall you respect any man's person." Therefore respect of persons is a sin. _I answer that,_ Respect of persons is opposed to distributive justice. For the equality of distributive justice consists in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605  
606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

persons

 

respect

 

justice

 

opposed

 

Whether

 

distributive

 
things
 
restitution
 

person

 

Therefore


personal

 
detention
 

dignity

 

Respect

 
Further
 

contrary

 

circumstance

 
forbidden
 

determinate

 

affairs


conversely

 

benefit

 

Divine

 
importance
 

Neither

 
equality
 

answer

 

consists

 

reference

 

includes


belongs

 

leaves

 

upraises

 

injustice

 

reading

 

Nothing

 

circumstanced

 

judicial

 

unjust

 

altogether


unable
 

involves

 

observe

 

stands

 

reason

 

QUESTION

 

RESPECT

 

PERSONS

 

compensation

 

remission