FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612  
613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   >>   >|  
stice. In this way respect of persons may take place in any judgment. Reply Obj. 2: When a person is more severely punished on account of a crime committed against a greater person, there is no respect of persons, because the very difference of persons causes, in that case, a diversity of things, as stated above (Q. 58, A. 10, ad 3; Q. 61, A. 2, ad 3). Reply Obj. 3: In pronouncing judgment one ought to succor the needy as far as possible, yet without prejudice to justice: else the saying of Ex. 23:3 would apply: "Neither shalt thou favor a poor man in judgment." _______________________ QUESTION 64 OF MURDER (In Eight Articles) In due sequence we must consider the vices opposed to commutative justice. We must consider (1) those sins that are committed in relation to involuntary commutations; (2) those that are committed with regard to voluntary commutations. Sins are committed in relation to involuntary commutations by doing an injury to one's neighbor against his will: and this can be done in two ways, namely by deed or by word. By deed when one's neighbor is injured either in his own person, or in a person connected with him, or in his possessions. We must therefore consider these points in due order, and in the first place we shall consider murder whereby a man inflicts the greatest injury on his neighbor. Under this head there are eight points of inquiry: (1) Whether it is a sin to kill dumb animals or even plants? (2) Whether it is lawful to kill a sinner? (3) Whether this is lawful to a private individual, or to a public person only? (4) Whether this is lawful to a cleric? (5) Whether it is lawful to kill oneself? (6) Whether it is lawful to kill a just man? (7) Whether it is lawful to kill a man in self-defense? (8) Whether accidental homicide is a mortal sin? _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 64, Art. 1] Whether It Is Unlawful to Kill Any Living Thing? Objection 1: It would seem unlawful to kill any living thing. For the Apostle says (Rom. 13:2): "They that resist the ordinance of God purchase to themselves damnation [*Vulg.: 'He that resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist, purchase themselves damnation.']." Now Divine providence has ordained that all living things should be preserved, according to Ps. 146:8, 9, "Who maketh grass to grow on the mountains . . . Who giveth to beasts their food." Therefore it seems unlawful
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612  
613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Whether

 

lawful

 

person

 

committed

 

commutations

 

neighbor

 
persons
 
judgment
 

involuntary

 

relation


resist

 
living
 

unlawful

 

ordinance

 
damnation
 

purchase

 

resisteth

 
points
 

injury

 

justice


things

 

respect

 

Unlawful

 
ARTICLE
 

severely

 
Living
 

Apostle

 

Objection

 

mortal

 

cleric


public

 

sinner

 

private

 

individual

 

oneself

 

punished

 

accidental

 

homicide

 

defense

 

maketh


preserved
 

Therefore

 

beasts

 

mountains

 

giveth

 

ordained

 

prejudice

 

Divine

 

providence

 

account