FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211  
212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   >>   >|  
se 15, "_He then smiteth his father or his mother shall surely be put to death._" Verse 17, "_He that curseth his father or his mother, shall surely be put to death._" If a Jew smote his neighbor, the law merely smote him in return. But if that same blow were given to a _parent_, the law struck the smiter _dead_. Why this difference in the punishment of the same act, inflicted on different persons? Answer--God guards the parental relation with peculiar care. It is the _centre_ of human relations. To violate that, is to violate _all_. Whoever trampled on _that_, showed that no relation had any sacredness in his eyes--that he was unfit to move among human relations who had violated one so sacred and tender.--Therefore, the Mosaic law uplifted his bleeding corpse, and brandished the ghastly terror around the parental relation to guard it from impious inroads. But why the difference in the penalty since the _act_ was the same? The sin had divers aggravations. 1. The relation violated was obvious--the distinction between parents and others, manifest, dictated by natural affection--a law of the constitution. 2. The act was violence to nature--a suicide on constitutional susceptibilities. 3. The parental relation then, as now, was the centre of the social system, and required powerful safe-guards. "_Honor thy father and thy mother_," stands at the head of those commands which prescribe the duties of man to man; and, throughout the Bible, the parental relation is God's favorite illustration, of his own relations to the whole family of man. In this case, death is inflicted not at all for the act of _smiting_, nor for smiting a _man_, but a _parent_--for violating a vital and sacred relation--a _distinction_ cherished by God, and around which, both in the moral and ceremonial law, He threw up a bulwark of defence. In the next verse, "He that stealeth a man," &c., the SAME PRINCIPLE is wrought out in still stronger relief. The crime here punished with death, is not the mere act of taking property from its owner, but the disregarding of _fundamental relations_, doing violence to an _immortal nature_, making war on a _sacred distinction_ of priceless worth. That distinction which is cast headlong by the principle of American slavery; which makes MEN "_chattels_." The incessant pains-taking throughout the old Testament, in the separation of human beings from brutes and things, shows God's regard for the sacredness of his o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211  
212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

relation

 

relations

 
parental
 

distinction

 

sacred

 
father
 

mother

 
violated
 
violence
 

nature


guards
 

centre

 

taking

 

sacredness

 

violate

 

smiting

 

parent

 

surely

 

difference

 
inflicted

separation
 

brutes

 

beings

 
Testament
 
things
 

violating

 

ceremonial

 
cherished
 

commands

 

regard


prescribe
 

stands

 

duties

 
family
 

illustration

 

favorite

 

disregarding

 

principle

 

property

 
slavery

American

 
fundamental
 

headlong

 
priceless
 
immortal
 

punished

 
PRINCIPLE
 

wrought

 

stealeth

 
defence