FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221  
222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   >>   >|  
after truth, and on that very account hold it disgraceful to assent to what is false. I do not deny that I make slips, but we must deal with the _sapiens_, whose characteristic it is never to err in giving his assent (66). Hear Arcesilas' argument: if the _sapiens_ ever gives his assent he will be obliged to _opine_, but he never will _opine_ therefore he never will give his assent. The Stoics and Antiochus deny the first of these statements, on the ground that it is possible to distinguish between true and false (67). Even if it be so the mere habit of assenting is full of peril. Still, our whole argument must tend to show that _perception_ in the Stoic sense is impossible (68). However, a few words first with Antiochus. When he was converted, what proof had he of the doctrine he had so long denied? (69) Some think he wished to found a school called by his own name. It is more probable that he could no longer bear the opposition of all other schools to the Academy (70). His conversion gave a splendid opening for an _argumentum ad hominem_ (71). Sec.64. _Quadam oratione_: so Halm, also Bait. after the best MSS., not _quandam orationem_ as Lamb., Orelli. _De ipsa re_: cf. _de causa ipsa_ above. _Respondere posse_: for the om. of _me_ before the infin, which has wrongly caused many edd. either to read _respondere_ (as Dav., Bait.) or to insert _me_ (as Lamb.), see n. on I. 7. Sec.65. _Studio certandi_: = [Greek: philoneikia]. _Pertinacia ... calumnia_: n. on 14. _Iurarem_: Cic. was thinking of his own famous oath at the end of his consulship. Sec.66. _Turpissimum_: cf. I. 45, _N.D._ I. 1. _Opiner_: _opinio_ or [Greek: doxa] is judgment based on insufficient grounds. _Sed quaerimus de sapiente_: cf. 115, _T.D._ IV. 55, 59 also _De Or._ III. 75 _non quid ego sed quid orator_. _Magnus ... opinator_: Aug. _Contra Acad._ III. 31 qu. this passage wrongly as from the _Hortensius_. He imitates it, _ibid._ I. 15 _magnus definitor_. _Qua fidunt_, etc.: these lines are part of Cic.'s _Aratea_, and are quoted in _N.D._ II. 105, 106. _Phoenices_: the same fact is mentioned by Ovid, _Fasti_ III. 107, _Tristia_ IV. 3, 1. _Sed Helicen_: the best MSS. om. _ad_, which Orelli places before _Helicen_. _Elimatas_: the MSS. are divided between this and _limatas_. _Elimare_, though a very rare word occurs _Ad Att._ XVI. 7, 3. _Visis cedo_: cf. n. on 38. _Vim maximam_: so _summum mu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221  
222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

assent

 

Orelli

 

Helicen

 

wrongly

 

Antiochus

 

argument

 
sapiens
 
insufficient
 

grounds

 

sapiente


quaerimus

 

consulship

 

calumnia

 

Iurarem

 

thinking

 

Pertinacia

 

philoneikia

 

Studio

 

certandi

 
famous

Opiner

 

opinio

 

Turpissimum

 

judgment

 

places

 

Tristia

 

Elimatas

 

divided

 
Elimare
 

limatas


Phoenices

 

mentioned

 

maximam

 

summum

 

occurs

 
account
 

passage

 

Hortensius

 

Contra

 

orator


Magnus

 
opinator
 

imitates

 

Aratea

 

quoted

 

magnus

 
definitor
 

fidunt

 

Respondere

 
perception