FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232  
233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   >>  
even without _quidem_, cf. Krebs and Allgayer, _Antibarbarus_ ed. 4 on _quin_. Sec.83. _In parvo lis sit_: Durand's em. for the _in parvulis sitis_ of the MSS., which Goer. alone defends. _Quattuor capita_: these were given in 40 by Lucullus, cf. also 77. _Epicurus_: as above in 19, 79 etc. Sec.84. _Geminum_: cf. 56. _Nota_: cf. 58 and the speech of Lucullus _passim_. _Ne sit ... potest_: cf. 80 _quasi quaeratur quid sit, non quid videatur. Si ipse erit_ for _ipse_ apparently = _is ipse_ cf. _M.D.F._ II. 93. Sec.85. _Quod non est_: = _qu. n. e. id quod esse videtur_. _Sui generis_: cf. 50, 54, 56. _Nullum esse pilum_, etc.: a strong expression of this belief is found in Seneca _Ep._. 113, 13, qu. R. and P. 380. Note the word _Stoicum_; Lucullus is of course not Stoic, but Antiochean. _Nihil interest_: the same opinion is expressed in 40, where see my note. _Visa res_: Halm writes _res a re_, it is not necessary, however, either in Gk. or Lat. to express _both_ of two related things when a word is inserted like _differat_ here, which shows that they _are_ related. Cf. the elliptic constructions in Gk. with [Greek: homoion, metaxy, mesos], and such words. _Eodem caelo atque_: a difficult passage. MSS. have _aqua_, an error easy, as Halm notes, to a scribe who understood _caelum_ to be the heaven, and not [Greek: glypheion], a graving tool. Faber and other old edd. defend the MSS. reading, adducing passages to show that sky and water were important in the making of statues. For _aqua_ Orelli conj. _acu_ = _schraffirnadel_, C.F. Hermann _caelatura_, which does not seem to be a Ciceronian word. Halm's _aeque_ introduces a construction with _ceteris omnibus_ which is not only not Ciceronian, but not Latin at all. I read _atque_, taking _ceteris omnibus_ to be the abl. neut. "all the other implements." Formerly I conj. _ascra_, or _atque in_, which last leading would make _omnibus_ = _om. statuis_. _Alexandros_: Lysippus alone was privileged to make statues of Alexander, as Apelles alone was allowed to paint the conqueror, cf. _Ad Fam._ V. 12, 7. Sec.86. _Anulo_: cf. 54. _Aliqui_: n. on 61. _Gallinarium_: cf. 57. _Adhibes artem_: cf. 20 _adhibita arte_. _Pictor ... tibicen_: so in 20. _Simul inflavit_: note _simul_ for _simul atque_, cf. _T.D._ IV. 12. _Nostri quidem_: i.e. _Romani_. _Admodum_: i.e. _adm. pauci_ cf. _De Leg._ III. 32 _pauci enim atque admodum pauci_. _Praeclara_: evidently a fem. adj. agreeing with _nat
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232  
233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   >>  



Top keywords:

Lucullus

 

omnibus

 

related

 

statues

 

Ciceronian

 

ceteris

 
quidem
 
schraffirnadel
 

Hermann

 

introduces


Orelli

 

caelatura

 

evidently

 

adducing

 

agreeing

 

understood

 

caelum

 

glypheion

 

heaven

 
scribe

graving

 

important

 

passages

 

construction

 

defend

 

reading

 

making

 

Formerly

 
Adhibes
 

adhibita


Gallinarium

 

Aliqui

 

Pictor

 

Nostri

 

Romani

 
Admodum
 

tibicen

 

inflavit

 

implements

 

leading


taking

 
admodum
 

allowed

 

conqueror

 

Apelles

 

Alexander

 
Alexandros
 

statuis

 

passage

 
Lysippus