FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2453   2454   2455   2456   2457   2458   2459   2460   2461   2462   2463   2464   2465   2466   2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477  
2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487   2488   2489   2490   2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   >>   >|  
ion between _whom_ and _can look_, and _whom_ relates to _Being_, which is the subject of _is."_ --_Wells's School Gram._, 113th Ed., p. 192. Neither this nor the subsequent method has been often called _"analysis;"_ for, in grammar, each user of this term has commonly applied it to some one method only,--the method preferred by himself. [332] The possessive phrase here should be, "_Andrews and Stoddard's_," as Wells and others write it. The adding of the apostrophe to the former name is wrong, even by the better half of Butler's own absurd and self-contradictory Rule: to wit, "When two or more nouns in the possessive case are connected by _and_, the possessive termination _should be added to each of them_; as, 'These are _John's and Eliza's_ books.' But, if objects are possessed in common by two or more, and the nouns are closely connected without any intervening words, the possessive termination is _added to the last noun only_; as, 'These are _John and Eliza's_ books.'"--_Butler's_ _Practical Gram._, p. 163. The sign twice used implies two governing nouns: "John's and Eliza's books." = "John's books and Eliza's;" "Andrews' and Stoddard's Latin Grammar," = "Andrews' (or Andrews's) Latin Grammar and Stoddard's" [333] In Mulligan's recent "Exposition of the Grammatical Structure of the English Language,"--the work of an able hand,--this kind of "Analysis," being most improperly pronounced "_the chief business of the grammarian_," is swelled by copious explanation under minute heads, to a volume containing more than three times as much matter as Greene's; but, since school-boys have little relish for long arguments, and prolixity had here already reached to satiety and disgust, it is very doubtful whether the practical utility of this "Improved Method of Teaching Grammar," will be greater in proportion to this increase of bulk.--G. B., 1853. [334] "I will not take upon me to say, whether we have any Grammar that sufficiently instructs us by rule and example; but I am sure we have none, that in the manner here attempted, teaches us what is right, by showing what is wrong; though this perhaps may prove _the more useful and effectual method_ of Instruction."--_Lowth's Gram., Pref._, p. viii. [335] With the possessive case and its governing noun, we use but _one article_; and sometimes it seems questionable, to which of the two that article properly relates: as, "This is one of _the_ Hebrews' children."--_Exodus_, ii,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2453   2454   2455   2456   2457   2458   2459   2460   2461   2462   2463   2464   2465   2466   2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477  
2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487   2488   2489   2490   2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

possessive

 

Andrews

 

method

 

Grammar

 

Stoddard

 
governing
 

connected

 

termination

 

Butler

 

article


relates

 

satiety

 
doubtful
 

disgust

 
children
 

practical

 

greater

 
proportion
 
Teaching
 

Method


reached

 

utility

 

Improved

 

Hebrews

 

matter

 

Greene

 
volume
 
arguments
 

prolixity

 

increase


relish

 

school

 

Exodus

 

effectual

 
Instruction
 

sufficiently

 

instructs

 
showing
 

manner

 

attempted


teaches

 

questionable

 
properly
 

adding

 

apostrophe

 

phrase

 

preferred

 

contradictory

 

absurd

 

applied