FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988  
989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   >>   >|  
to one noun, in any particular construction of it. Priestley observes, "Some writers affect to _transpose_ these words, and place the numeral adjective first; [as,] '_The first Henry_.' Hume's History, Vol. i, p. 497. This construction is common with this writer, but there seems to be a _want of dignity_ in it."--_Rudiments of E. Gram._, p. 150. Dr. Webster cites the word _Great_, in "_Alexander the Great_" as a _name_, or _part_ of a name; that is, he gives it as an instance of "_cognomination_." See his _American Dict._, 8vo. And if this is right, the article may be said to relate to the epithet only, as it appears to do. For, if the word is taken substantively, there is certainly no ellipsis; neither is there any transposition in putting it last, but rather, as Priestley suggests, in putting it first. OBS. 10.--The definite article is often prefixed to _comparatives_ and _superlatives_; and its effect is, as Murray observes, (in the words of Lowth,) "to mark the degree _the more_ strongly, and to define it _the more_ precisely: as, '_The more_ I examine it, _the better_ I like it.' 'I like this _the least_ of any.'"--_Murray's Gram._, p. 33; _Lowth's_, 14. "For neither if we eat, are we _the better_; neither if we eat not, are we _the worse_."--_1 Cor._, viii, 8. "One is not _the more_ agreeable to me for loving beef, as I do; nor _the less_ agreeable for preferring mutton."--_Kames, El. of Crit._, Vol. ii, p. 365. "They are not the men in the nation, _the most_ difficult to be replaced."--_Priestley's Gram._, p. 148. In these instances, the article seems to be used _adverbially_, and to relate only to the _adjective_ or _adverb_ following it. (See observation fourth, on the Etymology of Adverbs.) Yet none of our grammarians have actually reckoned _the_ an adverb. After the _adjective_, the noun might perhaps be supplied; but when the word _the_ is added to an _adverb_, we must either call it an adverb, or make an exception to Rule 1st above: and if an exception is to be made, the brief form which I have given, cannot well be improved. For even if a noun be understood, it may not appear that the article relates to it, rather than to the degree of the quality. Thus: "_The_ deeper the well, _the_ clearer the water." This Dr. Ash supposes to mean, "The deeper _well_ the well _is_, the clearer _water_ the water _is_."--_Ash's Gram._, p. 107. But does the text specify a _particular_ "deeper well" or "clearer water?" I thi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988  
989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
article
 

adverb

 

clearer

 
deeper
 
Priestley
 

adjective

 
relate
 

exception

 
agreeable
 

degree


putting

 

Murray

 

observes

 

construction

 

reckoned

 

Etymology

 
fourth
 

observation

 

Adverbs

 

grammarians


affect

 
nation
 

difficult

 

adverbially

 

instances

 
replaced
 

transpose

 

quality

 

relates

 

improved


understood

 

supposes

 

supplied

 

writers

 

substantively

 
dignity
 
Rudiments
 

appears

 

ellipsis

 

suggests


transposition

 

writer

 

epithet

 
instance
 

cognomination

 
Alexander
 

American

 

Webster

 

definite

 

numeral