FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037  
1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   >>   >|  
Christ parle_ par moi;" and this, too, might be imitated in English: "Since ye seek a proof _that Christ speaks_ by me." OBS. 13.--As prepositions very naturally govern any of our participles except the simple perfect, it undoubtedly seems agreeable to our idiom not to disturb this government, when we would express the subject or agent of the being, action, or passion, between the preposition and the participle. Hence we find that the doer or the sufferer of the action is usually made its possessor, whenever the sense does not positively demand a different reading. Against this construction there is seldom any objection, if the participle be taken entirely as a noun, so that it may be called a participial noun; as, "Much depends _on their observing of_ the rule."--_Lowth, Campbell_, and _L. Murray_. On the other hand, the participle after the objective is unobjectionable, if the noun or pronoun be the leading word in sense; as, "It would be idle to profess an apprehension of serious _evil resulting_ in any respect from the utmost _publicity being given_ to its contents."--_London Eclectic Review_, 1816. "The following is a beautiful instance of the _sound_ of words _corresponding_ to motion."--_Murray's Gram._, i, p. 333. "We shall discover many _things partaking_ of both those characters."--_West's Letters_, p. 182. "To a _person following_ the vulgar mode of omitting the comma."--_Churchill's Gram._, p. 365. But, in comparing the different constructions above noticed, writers are frequently puzzled to determine, and frequently too do they err in determining, which word shall be made the adjunct, and which the leading term. Now, wherever there is much doubt which of the two forms ought to be preferred, I think we may well conclude that both are wrong; especially, if there can easily be found for the idea an other expression that is undoubtedly clear and correct. Examples: "These appear to be instances of the present _participle being used_ passively."--_Murray's Gram._, p. 64. "These are examples of the past _participle being applied_ in an active sense."--_Ib._, 64. "We have some examples of _adverbs being used_ for substantives."--_Priestley's Gram._, p. 134; _Murray's_, 198; _Ingersoll's_, 206; _Fisk's_, 140; _Smith's_, 165. "By a _noun, pronoun_, or _adjective, being prefixed_ to the substantive."--_Murray's Gram._, p. 39; also _Ingersoll's, Fisk's, Alger's, Maltby's, Merchant's, Bacon's_, and others. Here, if the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037  
1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Murray
 

participle

 

action

 
leading
 
pronoun
 

frequently

 
examples
 

undoubtedly

 
Ingersoll
 

Christ


comparing

 

writers

 

noticed

 

Maltby

 

constructions

 

prefixed

 
adjective
 

determine

 

substantive

 

puzzled


omitting

 
things
 

partaking

 

characters

 

discover

 
Merchant
 

determining

 

Churchill

 

vulgar

 

person


Letters

 

substantives

 

expression

 

adverbs

 

Priestley

 
easily
 
correct
 

Examples

 

active

 

passively


applied

 

present

 

instances

 
adjunct
 

conclude

 
preferred
 

subject

 

express

 

passion

 

government