FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065  
1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   >>   >|  
perform that which is good, I find not _the ability_." Our Bible has it, "But _how_ to perform that which is good. I find not;" as if _the manner_ in which he might do good, was what the apostle found not: but Murray cites it differently, omitting the word _how_, as we see above. All active verbs to which something is subjoined by _when, where, whence, how_, or _why_, must be accounted intransitive, unless we suppose them to govern such nouns of time, place, degree, manner, or cause, as correspond to these connectives; as, "I _know why_ she blushed." Here we might supply the noun _reason_, as, "I know the _reason why_ she blushed;" but the word is needless, and I should rather parse _know_ as being intransitive. As for "_virtue in distress_," if this is an "_objective phrase_," and not to be analyzed, we have millions of the same sort; but, if one should say, "_Virtue in distress_ excites pity," the same phrase would demonstrate the absurdity of Murray's doctrine, because the two nouns here take _two different cases_. OBS. 6.--The word _that_, which is often employed to introduce a dependent clause, is, by some grammarians, considered as a _pronoun_, representing the clause which follows it; as, "I know _that_ Messias cometh."--_John_, iv, 25. This text they would explain to mean, "_Messias cometh_, I know _that_;" and their opinion seems to be warranted both by the origin and by the usual import of the particle. But, in conformity to general custom, and to his own views of the practical purposes of grammatical analysis, the author has ranked it with the conjunctions. And he thinks it better, to call those verbs intransitive, which are followed by _that_ and a dependent clause, than to supply the very frequent ellipses which the other explanation supposes. To explain it as a conjunction, connecting an active-transitive verb and its object, as several respectable grammarians do, appears to involve some inconsistency. If _that_ is a conjunction, it connects what precedes and what follows; but a transitive verb should exercise a direct government, without the intervention of a conjunction. On the other hand, the word _that_ has not, in any such sentence, the inherent nature of a pronoun. The transposition above, makes it only a _pronominal adjective_; as, "Messias cometh, I know _that fact_." And in many instances such a solution is impracticable; as, "The people sought him, and came unto him, and stayed him, _that_ he sho
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065  
1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
cometh
 

clause

 

Messias

 
intransitive
 
conjunction
 

perform

 
dependent
 

phrase

 
transitive
 

reason


supply

 

blushed

 

distress

 

grammarians

 

active

 

explain

 
Murray
 

manner

 

pronoun

 

origin


particle

 
frequent
 

import

 

custom

 

author

 
ranked
 

analysis

 

grammatical

 

purposes

 

practical


conjunctions

 

general

 

conformity

 

ellipses

 

thinks

 
inconsistency
 
pronominal
 

adjective

 

transposition

 

sentence


inherent

 

nature

 

instances

 
stayed
 

sought

 
solution
 

impracticable

 

people

 

respectable

 

appears