FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104  
1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   1127   1128   1129   >>   >|  
upon heaps;" and Scott's, "_man to man_, and _steel to steel_," may be interpreted, "_man being opposed_ to man, and _steel being opposed_ to steel:" "Now, man to man, and steel to steel, A chieftain's vengeance thou shalt feel."--_Lady of the Lake_. OBS. 6.--Cobbett, after his own hasty and dogmatical manner, rejects the whole theory of nominatives absolute, and teaches his "soldiers, sailors, apprentices, and ploughboys," that, "The supposition, that there can be a noun, or pronoun, which has reference to _no_ verb, and _no preposition_, is certainly a mistake."--_Cobbett's E. Gram._, 201. To sustain his position, he lays violent hands upon the plain truth, and even trips himself up in the act. Thus: "For want of a little thought, as to the matter immediately before us, some grammarians have found out '_an absolute case_,' as they call it; and Mr. Lindley Murray gives an instance of it in these words: '_Shame being lost_, all virtue is lost.' The full meaning of this sentence is this: '_It being_, or _the state of things being such, that_ shame _is_ lost, all virtue is lost.'"--_Cobbett's E. Gram._, 191. Again: "There must, you will bear in mind, always be a verb expressed or understood. One would think, that this was not the case in [some instances: as,] '_Sir_, I beg you to give me a bit of bread.' The sentence which follows the _Sir_, is complete; but the _Sir_ appears to stand wholly without connexion. However, the full meaning is this: 'I beg you, _who are a Sir_, to give me a bit of bread.' Now, if you take time to reflect a little on this matter, you will never be puzzled for a moment by those detached words, to suit which grammarians have invented _vocative cases_ and _cases absolute_, and a great many other appellations, with which they puzzle themselves, and confuse and bewilder and torment those who read their books."--_Ib._, Let. xix, 225 and 226. All this is just like Cobbett. But, let his admirers reflect on the matter as long as they please, the two _independent_ nominatives _it_ and _state_, in the text, "_It being_, or the state of things _being_ such," will forever stand a glaring confutation both of his doctrine and of his censure: "the _case absolute_" is there still! He has, in fact, only converted the single example into a double one! OBS. 7.--The Irish philologer, J. W. Wright, is even more confident than Cobbett, in denouncing "_the case absolute_;" and more severe in his repreh
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104  
1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   1127   1128   1129   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Cobbett
 

absolute

 

matter

 
grammarians
 
reflect
 

sentence

 
meaning
 

things

 
virtue
 

opposed


nominatives

 

confuse

 

puzzle

 

appellations

 

bewilder

 

torment

 
wholly
 

puzzled

 

moment

 

chieftain


invented

 
vocative
 

connexion

 

However

 

detached

 
double
 

converted

 

single

 

philologer

 

denouncing


severe

 

repreh

 

confident

 

Wright

 

interpreted

 
admirers
 
vengeance
 

independent

 

doctrine

 

censure


confutation

 

forever

 

glaring

 
pronoun
 

thought

 
reference
 

immediately

 

Murray

 

instance

 

Lindley