FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   1127   1128   1129   1130   1131  
1132   1133   1134   1135   1136   1137   1138   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   >>   >|  
ION SIXTH. The pronoun sometimes disagrees with its antecedent in one sense, because it takes it in an other; as, "I have perused Mr. Johnson's _Grammatical Commentaries_, and find _it_[380] a very laborious, learned, and useful Work."--_Tho. Knipe_, D. D. "_Lamps_ is of the plural number, because _it_ means more than one."--_Smith's New Gram._, p. 8. "_Man_ is of the masculine gender, because _it_ is the name of a male."--_Ib._ "The _Utica Sentinel_ says _it_ has not heard whether the wounds are dangerous."--_Evening Post_. (Better: "The _editor_ of the Utica Sentinel says, _he_ has not heard," &c.) "There is little _Benjamin_ with _their_ ruler."--_Psalms_, lxviii, 27. "_Her_ end when _emulation_ misses, _She_ turns to envy, stings, and hisses."--_Swift's Poems_, p. 415. OBSERVATIONS ON RULE X. OBS. 1.--Respecting a pronoun, the main thing is, that the reader perceive clearly _for what it stands_; and next, that he do not misapprehend _its relation of case_. For the sake of completeness and uniformity in parsing, it is, I think, expedient to apply the foregoing rule not only to those pronouns which have obvious antecedents expressed, but also to such as are not accompanied by the nouns for which they stand. Even those which are put for persons or things unknown or indefinite, may be said to agree with whatever is meant by them; that is, with such nouns as their own properties indicate. For the reader will naturally understand something by every pronoun, unless it be a mere expletive, and without any antecedent. For example: "It would depend upon _who_ the forty were."--_Trial at Steubenville_, p. 50. Here _who_ is an indefinite relative, equivalent to _what persons_; of the third person, plural, masculine; and is in the nominative case after were, by Rule 6th. For the full construction seems to be this: "It would depend upon _the persons who_ the forty were." So _which_, for _which person_, or _which thing_, (if we call it a pronoun rather than an adjective,) may be said to have the properties of the noun _person_ or _thing_ understood; as, "His notions fitted things so well, That _which_ was _which_ he could not tell."--_Hudibras_. OBS. 2.--The pronoun _we_ is used by the speaker or writer to represent himself and others, and is therefore plural. But it is sometimes used, by a sort of fiction, in stead of the singular, to intimate that the speaker or writer is not alone in his opinions; or
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   1127   1128   1129   1130   1131  
1132   1133   1134   1135   1136   1137   1138   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
pronoun
 

plural

 

persons

 
person
 
properties
 

masculine

 
reader
 

Sentinel

 
speaker
 

writer


indefinite

 

depend

 

things

 

antecedent

 

expletive

 

unknown

 
understand
 

naturally

 

Hudibras

 

represent


fitted

 
intimate
 

opinions

 

singular

 

fiction

 
notions
 

nominative

 

equivalent

 

relative

 

Steubenville


adjective

 

understood

 

construction

 

accompanied

 

gender

 
wounds
 
Benjamin
 

editor

 

Better

 

dangerous


Evening

 

number

 

perused

 
Johnson
 

Grammatical

 
disagrees
 

Commentaries

 

learned

 

laborious

 

Psalms