FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178  
1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   >>   >|  
e is put far, "_Thy ignorance of me_;" for an other's ignorance would be no argument in regard to the individual addressed. "_I, to bear this_, that never knew but better, _is_ some burden."--_Beauties of Shak._, p. 327. Here the infinitive _to bear_, which is the subject of the verb _is_, is limited in sense by the pronoun _I_, which is put absolute in the nominative, though perhaps _improperly_; because, "_For me to bear this_," &c., will convey the same meaning, in a form much more common, and perhaps more grammatical. In the following couplet, there is an ellipsis of the infinitive; for the phrase, "fool with fool," means, "_for_ fool _to contend_ with fool," or, "for one fool to contend with an other:" "Blockheads with reason wicked wits abhor, But _fool with fool_ is barb'rous civil war." --_Pope, Dunciad_, B. iii, l. 175. OBS. 12.--The objective noun or pronoun thus introduced by _for_ before the infinitive, was erroneously called by Priestley, "_the subject of the affirmation_;" (_Gram._, p. 132;) and Murray, Ingersoll, and others, have blindly copied the blunder. See _Murray's Gram._, p. 184; _Ingersoll's_, 244. Again, Ingersoll says, "The infinitive mood, or part of a sentence, is sometimes the subject of a verb, _and is, therefore, its_ NOMINATIVE."--_Conversations on English Gram._, p. 246. To this erroneous deduction, the phraseology used by Murray and others too plainly gives countenance: "The infinitive mood, or part of a sentence, is sometimes put _as the nominative case_ to the verb."--_Murray's Gram._, p. 144; _Fisk's_, 123; _Kirkham's_, 188; _Lennie's_, 99; _Bullions's_, 89; and many more. Now the objective before the infinitive may not improperly be called _the subject_ of this form of the verb, as the nominative is, of the finite; but to call it "the subject _of the affirmation_," is plainly absurd; because no infinitive, in English, ever expresses an affirmation. And again, if a whole phrase or sentence is made the subject of a _finite_ verb, or of an affirmation, no one word contained in it, can singly claim this title. Nor can the whole, by virtue of this relation, be said to be "in the _nominative case_;" because, in the nature of things, neither phrases nor sentences are capable of being declined by cases. OBS. 13.--Any phrase or sentence which is made the subject of a finite verb, must be taken in the sense of _one thing_, and be spoken of as _a whole_; so that the verb's ag
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178  
1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
infinitive
 

subject

 

nominative

 
affirmation
 
Murray
 

sentence

 
finite
 

Ingersoll

 
phrase
 

contend


English

 

plainly

 

called

 

objective

 

improperly

 

pronoun

 
ignorance
 

Lennie

 

Bullions

 

absurd


Kirkham

 
deduction
 

phraseology

 

erroneous

 

regard

 
expresses
 

countenance

 

argument

 

capable

 

declined


sentences

 

phrases

 

spoken

 

things

 

contained

 
singly
 
nature
 

relation

 

virtue

 

wicked


reason

 

Blockheads

 

Dunciad

 
limited
 

common

 
meaning
 

convey

 

grammatical

 

absolute

 

ellipsis