FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070  
1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   >>   >|  
e Obs. 8, above. One late grammarian, whose style is on the whole highly commendable for its purity and accuracy, forbears to condemn the phraseology here spoken of; and, though he does not expressly defend and justify it, he seems disposed to let it pass, with the license of the following canon. "For convenience, it may be well to state it as a rule, that--_Passive verbs govern an objective, when the nominative to the passive verb is not the proper object of the active voice_."--_Barnard's Analytic Gram._, p. 134. An other asserts the government of two cases by very many of our active verbs, and the government of one by almost any passive verb, according to the following rules: "Verbs of teaching, giving, and some others of a similar nature, govern two objectives, the one of a person and the other of a thing; as, He taught _me grammar_: His tutor gave _him a lesson_: He promised _me a reward_. A passive verb may govern an objective, when the words immediately preceding and following it, do not refer to the same thing; as, Henry _was offered a dollar_ by his father to induce him to remain."--_J. M. Putnam's Gram._, pp. 110 and 112. OBS. 13.--The common dogmas, that an active verb must govern an object, and that a neuter or intransitive verb must not, amount to nothing as directions to the composer; because the classification of verbs depends upon this very matter, whether they have, or have not, an object after them; and no general principle has been, or can be, furnished beforehand, by which their fitness or unfitness for taking such government can be determined. This must depend upon usage, and usage must conform to the sense intended. Very many verbs--probably a vast majority--govern an object sometimes, but not always: many that are commonly intransitive or neuter, are not in all their uses so; and many that are commonly transitive, have sometimes no apparent regimen. The distinction, then, in our dictionaries, of verbs active and neuter, or transitive and intransitive, serves scarcely any other purpose, than to show how the presence or absence of the objective case, affects the meaning of the word. In some instances the signification of the verb seems almost merged in that of its object; _as, to lay hold, to make use, to take care_. In others, the transitive character of the word is partial; as, "He _paid_ my _board_; I _told you so_." Some verbs will govern any objective whatever; as, _to name, to mention_. What i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070  
1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
govern
 

object

 

active

 
objective
 
transitive
 

passive

 
neuter
 

intransitive

 
government
 

commonly


matter

 

taking

 

depends

 

determined

 

directions

 

composer

 
classification
 

fitness

 

conform

 

depend


furnished

 
unfitness
 

general

 

principle

 

intended

 
apparent
 

character

 

partial

 

mention

 

merged


signification

 

distinction

 

dictionaries

 

serves

 

regimen

 
scarcely
 
purpose
 

affects

 

meaning

 

instances


absence

 

presence

 

majority

 
license
 

convenience

 
defend
 

justify

 

disposed

 

Barnard

 

Analytic