FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089  
1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   >>   >|  
was a swindler_." (3.) "To prevent _its_ being a dry _detail_ of terms."--_Buck_. Better, "To prevent it _from_ being a dry detail of terms." [361] NOTE II.--The nominative which follows a verb or participle, ought to accord in signification, either literally or figuratively, with the preceding term which is taken for a sign of the same thing. Errors: (1.) "_To be convicted_ of bribery, was then a crime altogether unpardonable."--_Blair's Rhet._, p. 265. To be convicted of a crime, is not the crime itself; say, therefore, "_Bribery_ was then a _crime_ altogether unpardonable." (2.) "The second person is the _object_ of the Imperative."--_Murray's Gram., Index_, ii, 292. Say rather, "The second person is the _subject_ of the imperative;" for the _object_ of a verb is the word governed by it, and not its nominative. IMPROPRIETIES FOR CORRECTION. FALSE SYNTAX UNDER RULE VI. UNDER THE RULE ITSELF.--OF PROPER IDENTITY. "Who would not say, 'If it be _me_,' rather than, If it be _I_?"--_Priestley's Gram._, p. 105. [FORMULE.--Not proper, because the pronoun _me_,--which comes after the neuter verb _be_, is in the objective case, and does not agree with the pronoun _it_, the verb's nominative,[362] which refers to the same thing. But, according to Rule 6th, "A noun or a pronoun put after a verb or participle not transitive, agrees in case with a preceding noun or pronoun referring to the same thing." Therefore, _me_ should be _I_; thus, "Who would not say, 'If it be _I_,' rather than, 'If it be _me_?'"] "Who is there? It is me."--_Priestley, ib._, p. 104. "It is him."--_Id., ib._, 104. "Are these the houses you were speaking of? Yes, they are them."--_Id., ib._, 104. "It is not me you are in love with."--_Addison's Spect._, No. 290; _Priestley's Gram._, p. 104; and _Campbell's Rhet._, p. 203. "It cannot be me."--SWIFT: _Priestley's Gram._, p. 104. "To that which once was thee."--PRIOR: _ib._, 104. "There is but one man that she can have, and that is me."--CLARISSA: _ib._, 104. "We enter, as it were, into his body, and become, in some measure, him."--ADAM SMITH: _ib._, p. 105. "Art thou proud yet? Ay, that I am not thee."--_Shak., Timon_. "He knew not whom they were."--_Milnes, Greek Gram._, p. 234. "Who do you think me to be?"--_Priestley's Gram._, p. 108. "Whom do men say that I, the Son of man, am?"--_Matt._, xvi, 13. "But whom say ye that I am?"--_Ib._, xvi, 15.--"Whom think ye that I am? I am not he."--_Acts
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089  
1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Priestley
 

pronoun

 

nominative

 
object
 
person
 

preceding

 
convicted
 

altogether

 
detail

prevent

 

unpardonable

 

participle

 

CLARISSA

 

Murray

 

Addison

 

Better

 
Campbell
 

swindler


Milnes

 

measure

 

Imperative

 
Errors
 

bribery

 

PROPER

 

IDENTITY

 
proper
 

FORMULE


ITSELF

 

IMPROPRIETIES

 

governed

 

imperative

 

CORRECTION

 

SYNTAX

 

neuter

 

signification

 
accord

Therefore
 

Bribery

 

subject

 

houses

 

referring

 

agrees

 

refers

 
objective
 

figuratively


literally
 

transitive

 

speaking