FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088  
1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   >>   >|  
, could possibly impose such teaching anywhere. The first, though written by Lowth, is not a whit wiser than to say, "The preposition _to_ has _always_ an infinitive mood after it, _unless it be_ a preposition." And this latter absurdity is even a better rule for all infinitives, than the former for all predicated nominatives. Nor is there much more fitness in any of the rest. "The verb TO BE, _through all_," or even _in any_, of its parts, has neither "_always_" nor _usually_ a case "_expressed_ or _understood_" after it; and, even when there is a noun or a pronoun put after it, the case is, in very many instances, not to be determined by that which "_next_" or "_immediately_" precedes the verb. Examples: "A _sect of freethinkers_ is a _sum_ of ciphers."--_Bentley_. "And _I_ am this _day_ weak, though anointed _king_."--_2 Sam._, iii, 39. "_What_ made _Luther_ a great _man_, was _his_ unshaken _reliance_ on God."--_Kortz's Life of Luther_, p. 13. "The devil offers his service; _He_ is sent with a positive _commission_ to be a lying _spirit_ in the mouth of all the prophets."--_Calvin's Institutes_, p. 131. It is perfectly certain that in these four texts, the words _sum, king, reliance_, and _spirit_, are _nominatives_, after the verb or participle; and not _objectives_, as they must be, if there were any truth in the common assertion, "that the two cases, which, in the construction of the sentence, are _the next_ before and after it, must always be alike."--_Smith's New Gram._, p. 98. Not only may the nominative before the verb be followed by an objective, but the nominative after it may be preceded by a possessive; as, "Amos, the herdsman of _Tekoa_, was not a _prophet's_ son."--"It is the _king's_ chapel, and it is the _king's_ court."--_Amos_, vii, 13. How ignorant then must that person be, who cannot see the falsity of the instructions above cited! How careless the reader who overlooks it! NOTES TO RULE VI. NOTE I.--The putting of a noun in an unknown case after a participle or a participial noun, produces an anomaly which it seems better to avoid; for the cases ought to be _clear_, even in exceptions to the common rules of construction. Examples: (1.) "WIDOWHOOD, _n._ The state _of being a widow_."--_Webster's Dict._ Say rather, "WIDOWHOOD, _n._ The state of a widow."--_Johnson, Walker, Worcester_. (2.) "I had a suspicion of the _fellow's_ being a _swindler_/" Say rather, "I had a suspicion _that the fellow
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088  
1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
nominative
 

Examples

 

construction

 
Luther
 
reliance
 

spirit

 
participle
 

preposition

 
fellow
 

suspicion


common

 

nominatives

 

WIDOWHOOD

 

objective

 

objectives

 

possessive

 
preceded
 

sentence

 

assertion

 

careless


anomaly

 
produces
 

participial

 

putting

 

unknown

 
exceptions
 

Walker

 

Worcester

 

swindler

 

Johnson


Webster

 

ignorant

 

person

 

chapel

 

prophet

 
reader
 
overlooks
 

falsity

 

instructions

 

herdsman


fitness

 

instances

 

pronoun

 
expressed
 

understood

 
predicated
 

written

 

teaching

 

possibly

 

impose