FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051  
1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   >>   >|  
Is Burns also wrong, about "_miss's fine lunardi_," and "_miss's bonnet?_"--_Poems_, p. 44. Or did Scott write inaccurately, whose guide "Led slowly through the _pass's_ jaws?"--_Lady of the Lake_, p. 121. So much for the _ss_; nor is the rule for the termination _ence_, or (as Smith has it) _nce_, more true. _Prince's_ and _dunce's_ are as good possessives as any; and so are the following: "That vice should triumph, virtue vice obey; This sprung some doubt of _Providence's_ sway."--_Parnell_. "And sweet _Benevolence's_ mild command."--_Lord Lyttleton_. "I heard the _lance's_ shivering crash, As when the whirlwind rends the ash."--_Sir Walter Scott_. OBS. 30.--The most common rule now in use for the construction of the possessive case, is a shred from the old code of Latin grammar: "One substantive governs _another_, signifying a different thing, _in_ the possessive or genitive case."--_L. Murray's Rule X_. This canon not only leaves occasion for an additional one respecting pronouns of the possessive case, but it is also obscure in its phraseology, and too negligent of the various modes in which nouns may come together in English. All nouns used adjectively, and many that are compounded together, seem to form exceptions to it. But who can limit or enumerate these _exceptions?_ Different combinations of nouns have so often little or no difference of meaning, or of relation to each other, and so frequently is the very same vocal expression written variously by our best scholars, and ablest lexicographers, that in many ordinary instances it seems scarcely possible to determine who or what is right. Thus, on the authority of Johnson, one might write, _a stone's cast_, or _stone's throw_; but Webster has it, _stones-cast_, or _stones-throw_; Maunder, _stonecast, stonethrow_; Chalmers, _stonescast_; Worcester, _stone's-cast_. So Johnson and Chalmers write _stonesmickle_, a bird; Webster has it, _stone's-mickle_; yet, all three refer to Ainsworth as their authority, and his word is _stone-smickle_: Littleton has it _stone-smich_. Johnson and Chalmers write, _popeseye_ and _sheep's eye_; Walker, Maunder, and Worcester, _popeseye_ and _sheep's-eye_; Scott has _pope's-eye_ and _sheepseye_; Webster, _pope's-eye_ and _sheep's-eye, bird-eye_, and _birds-eye._ Ainsworth has _goats beard_, for the name of a plant; Johnson, _goatbeard_; Webster, _goat-beard_ and _goats-beard._ Ainsworth has _prince's feather_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051  
1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Johnson
 

Webster

 

Ainsworth

 
Chalmers
 
possessive
 

Worcester

 
Maunder
 

exceptions

 
stones
 

authority


popeseye

 

Different

 

combinations

 

enumerate

 

sheepseye

 

difference

 
meaning
 

relation

 

prince

 

feather


negligent

 
compounded
 

goatbeard

 

adjectively

 

English

 
frequently
 

Littleton

 

smickle

 

Walker

 

phraseology


stonescast

 

stonesmickle

 

stonethrow

 

stonecast

 

written

 
variously
 
expression
 

mickle

 

scholars

 

scarcely


determine

 

instances

 

ablest

 
lexicographers
 

ordinary

 
possessives
 

Prince

 

triumph

 

Parnell

 

Benevolence