FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991  
992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   >>   >|  
Old and _the_ New _Testament_." But, in any such case, to repeat the article when the noun is made plural, is a huge blunder; because it implies a repetition of the plural noun. And again, not to repeat the article when the noun is singular, is also wrong; because it forces the adjectives to coalesce in describing one and the same thing. Thus, to say, "_The_ north and south _pole_" is certainly wrong, unless we mean by it, _one pole_, or _slender stick of wood_, pointing north and south; and again, to say, "_The_ north and _the_ south _poles_," is also wrong, unless we mean by it, _several poles at the north_ and _others at the south_. So the phrase, "_The_ Old and New _Testament_" is wrong, because we have not _one Testament that is both Old and New_; and again, "_The_ Old and _the_ New _Testaments_," is wrong, because we have not several _Old Testaments and several New ones_: at least we have them not in the Bible. OBS. 17.--Sometimes a noun that _admits no article_, is preceded by adjectives that do not describe the same thing; as, "Never to jumble _metaphorical and plain language_ together."--_Blair's Rhet._, p. 146. This means, "_metaphorical language_ and _plain language_;" and, for the sake of perfect clearness, it would perhaps be better to express it so. "For as _intrinsic and relative beauty_ must often be blended in the same building, it becomes a difficult task to attain _both_ in any perfection."--_Karnes, El. of Crit._, Vol. ii, p. 330. That is, "_intrinsic beauty_ and _relative beauty_" must often be blended; and this phraseology would be better. "In correspondence to that distinction of _male and female sex_."--_Blair's Rhet._, p. 74. This may be expressed as well or better, in half a dozen other ways; for the article may be added, or the noun may be made plural, with or without the article, and before or after the adjectives. "They make no distinction between causes of civil and criminal jurisdiction."-- _Adams's Rhet._, Vol. i, p. 302. This means--"between causes of civil and _causes_ of criminal jurisdiction;" and, for the sake of perspicuity, it ought to have been so written,--or, still better, _thus_: "They make no distinction between civil causes and criminal." NOTES TO RULE I. NOTE I.--When the indefinite article is required, _a_ should always be used before the sound of a consonant, and _an_, before that of a vowel; as, "With the talents of _an_ angel, a man may be _a_ fool."--_Young_.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991  
992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
article
 

beauty

 

language

 
plural
 
criminal
 

distinction

 
Testament
 

adjectives

 
metaphorical

jurisdiction

 

relative

 

intrinsic

 

Testaments

 

repeat

 

blended

 

expressed

 
female
 

correspondence


consonant

 

required

 

talents

 
indefinite
 

perspicuity

 

written

 

pointing

 
slender
 

phrase


blunder

 

implies

 

repetition

 

coalesce

 

describing

 

forces

 

singular

 

Sometimes

 
attain

perfection
 

difficult

 

Karnes

 

building

 

describe

 

preceded

 

admits

 
jumble
 

express


clearness
 

perfect

 

phraseology