FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993  
994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   >>   >|  
nce is formed between individual epithets, the noun which follows must not be made plural; because the article, in such a case, cannot be repeated as the construction of correspondents requires. Thus, it is improper to say, "Both _the_ first and second _editions_" or, "Both _the_ first and _the_ second _editions_" for the accurate phrase, "Both _the_ first and _the_ second _edition_;" and still worse to say, "Neither _the_ Old nor New _Testaments_" or, "Neither _the_ Old nor _the_ New _Testaments_" for the just expression, "Neither _the_ Old nor _the_ New _Testament_." Yet we may say, "Neither _the old_ nor _the new statutes_" or, "Both _the early_ and _the late editions_;" for here the epithets severally apply to more than one thing. NOTE IX.--In a series of three or more terms, if the article is used with any, it should in general be added either to every one, or else to the first only. The following phrase is therefore inaccurate: "Through their attention to the helm, the sails, or rigging."--_Brown's Estimate_, Vol. i, p. 11. Say, "_the_ rigging." NOTE X.--As the article _an_ or _a_ denotes "_one thing of a kind_," it should not be used as we use _the_, to denote emphatically a _whole kind_; and again, when the species is said to be _of the genus_, no article should be used to limit the latter. Thus some will say, "_A jay_ is a sort of _a bird_;" whereas they ought to say, "_The jay_ is a sort _of bird_." Because it is absurd to suggest, that _one jay_ is _a sort_ of _one bird_. Yet we may say, "_The jay_ is _a bird_," or, "_A jay_ is _a bird_;" because, as every species is one under the genus, so every individual is one under both. NOTE XI.--The article should not be used before the names of virtues, vices, passions, arts, or sciences, in their general sense; before terms that are strictly limited by other definitives; or before any noun whose signification is sufficiently definite without it: as, "_Falsehood_ is odious."--"_Iron_ is useful."--"_Beauty_ is vain."--"_Admiration_ is useless, when it is not supported by _domestic worth_"--_Webster's Essays_, p. 30. NOTE XII.--When titles are mentioned merely as titles; or names of things, merely as names or words; the article should not be used before them: as, "He is styled _Marquis_;" not, "_the_ Marquis," or, "_a_ Marquis,"--"Ought a teacher to call his pupil _Master_?"--"_Thames_ is derived from the Latin name _Tam~esis_." NOTE XIII.--When a comparison o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993  
994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
article
 

Neither

 

editions

 
Marquis
 
rigging
 

titles

 
general
 

phrase

 
species
 

individual


epithets

 

Testaments

 

signification

 

Because

 

definitives

 

absurd

 
passions
 

sciences

 

virtues

 

strictly


sufficiently

 
suggest
 

limited

 

Essays

 

Master

 
teacher
 

styled

 

Thames

 

derived

 

comparison


Beauty

 

Admiration

 

Falsehood

 

odious

 

useless

 
supported
 
mentioned
 

things

 

domestic

 

Webster


definite

 

Estimate

 

Testament

 
expression
 

statutes

 
severally
 

edition

 

accurate

 

formed

 

plural