FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347  
348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   >>   >|  
in order that she may be unable to reveal the outrage. She reveals it, however, by taking a staff in her mouth, guiding it with her arms, and writing in the sand, 'Stuprum. Chiron. Demetrius.' Titus soon afterwards says: I will go get a leaf of brass, And with a gad of steel will write these words, And lay it by. The angry northern wind Will blow these sands, like Sibyl's leaves, abroad, And where's your lesson then? Perhaps in the old _Hamlet_, which may have been a play something like _Titus Andronicus_, Hamlet at this point did write something of the Ghost's message in his tables. In any case Shakespeare, whether he wrote _Titus Andronicus_ or only revised an older play on the subject, might well recall this incident, as he frequently reproduces other things in that drama. FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 258: The reader will observe that this suggestion of a _further_ reason for his making the note may be rejected without the rest of the interpretation being affected.] NOTE E. THE GHOST IN THE CELLARAGE. It has been thought that the whole of the last part of I. v., from the entrance of Horatio and Marcellus, follows the old play closely, and that Shakespeare is condescending to the groundlings. Here again, whether or no he took a suggestion from the old play, I see no reason to think that he wrote down to his public. So far as Hamlet's state of mind is concerned, there is not a trace of this. Anyone who has a difficulty in understanding it should read Coleridge's note. What appears grotesque is the part taken by the Ghost, and Hamlet's consequent removal from one part of the stage to another. But, as to the former, should we feel anything grotesque in the four injunctions 'Swear!' if it were not that they come from under the stage--a fact which to an Elizabethan audience, perfectly indifferent to what is absurdly called stage illusion, was probably not in the least grotesque? And as to the latter, if we knew the Ghost-lore of the time better than we do, perhaps we should see nothing odd in Hamlet's insisting on moving away and proposing the oath afresh when the Ghost intervenes. But, further, it is to be observed that he does not merely propose the oath afresh. He first makes Horatio and Marcellus swear never to make known what they have _seen
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347  
348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Hamlet

 

grotesque

 
Andronicus
 

Marcellus

 

Horatio

 

suggestion

 
Shakespeare
 
reason
 

afresh

 

Anyone


propose
 
difficulty
 
appears
 

intervenes

 

Coleridge

 

observed

 
concerned
 

understanding

 

groundlings

 

condescending


public

 

perfectly

 

indifferent

 

called

 

audience

 

Elizabethan

 

illusion

 

moving

 

proposing

 

removal


absurdly

 

insisting

 

injunctions

 

consequent

 

making

 
northern
 
lesson
 

Perhaps

 

leaves

 

abroad


reveals
 
taking
 

outrage

 

unable

 

reveal

 

guiding

 
Demetrius
 

Chiron

 
Stuprum
 

writing