FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356  
357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   >>   >|  
cene. But of all this, even if he were clearly conscious of it, he cannot speak to Horatio; for his love to Ophelia is a subject on which he has never opened his lips to his friend. If we realise the situation, then, we shall, I think, repress the wish that Hamlet had 'made some other defence' than that of madness. We shall feel only tragic sympathy. * * * * * As I have referred to Hamlet's apology, I will add a remark on it from a different point of view. It forms another refutation of the theory that Hamlet has delayed his vengeance till he could publicly convict the King, and that he has come back to Denmark because now, with the evidence of the commission in his pocket, he can safely accuse him. If that were so, what better opportunity could he possibly find than this occasion, where he has to express his sorrow to Laertes for the grievous wrongs which he has unintentionally inflicted on him? NOTE H. THE EXCHANGE OF RAPIERS. I am not going to discuss the question how this exchange ought to be managed. I wish merely to point out that the stage-direction fails to show the sequence of speeches and events. The passage is as follows (Globe text): _Ham._ Come, for the third, Laertes: you but dally; I pray you, pass with your best violence; I am afeard you make a wanton of me. _Laer._ Say you so? come on. [_They play._ _Osr._ Nothing, neither way. _Laer._ Have at you now! [_Laertes wounds Hamlet; then, in scuffling, they change rapiers, and Hamlet wounds Laertes._[264] _King._ Part them; they are incensed. _Ham._ Nay, come, again. _The Queen falls._[265] _Osr._ Look to the Queen there, ho! _Hor._ They bleed on both sides. How is it, my lord? _Osr._ How is't, Laertes? The words 'and Hamlet wounds Laertes' in Rowe's stage-direction destroy the point of the words given to the King in the text. If Laertes is already wounded, why should the King care whether the fencers are parted or not? What makes him cry out is that, while he sees his purpose effected as regards Hamlet, he also sees Laertes in danger through the exchange of foils in the scuffle. Now it is not to be supposed that Laertes is particularly dear to him; but he sees instantaneously that, if Laertes escapes the poisoned foil, he w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356  
357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Laertes

 

Hamlet

 
wounds
 

exchange

 

direction

 

Nothing

 
rapiers
 
change
 

scuffling

 

escapes


violence
 
passage
 
wanton
 

afeard

 

poisoned

 

fencers

 
parted
 

wounded

 

purpose

 

effected


scuffle

 

destroy

 

danger

 

incensed

 

instantaneously

 

supposed

 

tragic

 

sympathy

 

defence

 

madness


referred

 

apology

 

remark

 

Horatio

 

conscious

 
Ophelia
 
subject
 

situation

 

repress

 

realise


friend
 
opened
 

refutation

 

theory

 

EXCHANGE

 

RAPIERS

 
grievous
 

wrongs

 
unintentionally
 

inflicted