FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405  
406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   >>  
-on' when the mere sense would lead one to pass to the next line without any pause.[287] This distinction is in a great majority of cases quite easy to draw: in others it is difficult. The reader cannot judge by rules of grammar, or by marks of punctuation (for there is a distinct pause at the end of many a line where most editors print no stop): he must trust his ear. And readers will differ, one making a distinct pause where another does not. This, however, does not matter greatly, so long as the reader is consistent; for the important point is not the precise number of run-on lines in a play, but the difference in this matter between one play and another. Thus one may disagree with Koenig in his estimate of many instances, but one can see that he is consistent. In Shakespeare's early plays, 'overflows' are rare. In the _Comedy of Errors_, for example, their percentage is 12.9 according to Koenig[288] (who excludes rhymed lines and some others). In the generally admitted last plays they are comparatively frequent. Thus, according to Koenig, the percentage in the _Winter's Tale_ is 37.5, in the _Tempest_ 41.5, in _Antony_ 43.3, in _Coriolanus_ 45.9, in _Cymbeline_ 46, in the parts of _Henry VIII._ assigned by Spedding to Shakespeare 53.18. Koenig's results for the four tragedies are as follows: _Othello_, 19.5; _Hamlet_, 23.1; _King Lear_, 29.3; _Macbeth_, 36.6; (_Timon_, the whole play, 32.5). _Macbeth_ here again, therefore, stands decidedly last: indeed it stands near the first of the latest plays. And no one who has ever attended to the versification of _Macbeth_ will be surprised at these figures. It is almost obvious, I should say, that Shakespeare is passing from one system to another. Some passages show little change, but in others the change is almost complete. If the reader will compare two somewhat similar soliloquies, 'To be or not to be' and 'If it were done when 'tis done,' he will recognise this at once. Or let him search the previous plays, even _King Lear_, for twelve consecutive lines like these: If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well It were done quickly: if the assassination Could trammel up the consequence, and catch With his surcease success; that but this blow Might be the be-all and the end-all here, But here, upon this bank and shoal of time, We 'ld jump the life to come. But in these cases We still have judgement here; that we but teach
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405  
406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   >>  



Top keywords:

Koenig

 

Macbeth

 

reader

 
Shakespeare
 

change

 
matter
 

consistent

 
stands
 

percentage

 
distinct

system

 
passages
 
versification
 
decidedly
 

latest

 
passing
 

obvious

 

figures

 

attended

 
surprised

success

 

surcease

 
trammel
 

consequence

 

judgement

 

assassination

 

recognise

 

soliloquies

 

compare

 

similar


search

 

quickly

 

previous

 
twelve
 

consecutive

 

complete

 
frequent
 

readers

 
differ
 

making


editors

 
greatly
 

difference

 
number
 

precise

 

important

 
punctuation
 

distinction

 

majority

 

grammar