FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409  
410   411   412   413   >>  
8 | 0 Othello, | 2 | 0 Lear, | 5 | 1 Timon (whole), | 16 | 5 (Sh. in Fleay), | 14 | 7 (Sh. in Globe), | 13 | 2 Macbeth, | 21 | 2 ----------------------------------------- Now here the figures for the first three plays tell us practically nothing. The tendency to a freer use of these endings is not visible. As to _Timon_, the number of weak endings, I think, tells us little, for probably only two or three are Shakespeare's; but the rise in the number of light endings is so marked as to be significant. And most significant is this rise in the case of _Macbeth_, which, like Shakespeare's part of _Timon_, is much shorter than the preceding plays. It strongly confirms the impression that in _Macbeth_ we have the transition to Shakespeare's last style, and that the play is the latest of the five tragedies.[290] FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 282: The fact that _King Lear_ was performed at Court on December 26, 1606, is of course very far from showing that it had never been performed before.] [Footnote 283: I have not tried to discover the source of the difference between these two reckonings.] [Footnote 284: _Der Vers in Shakspere's Dramen_, 1888.] [Footnote 285: In the parts of _Timon_ (Globe text) assigned by Mr. Fleay to Shakespeare, I find the percentage to be about 74.5. Koenig gives 62.8 as the percentage in the whole of the play.] [Footnote 286: I have noted also what must be a mistake in the case of Pericles. Koenig gives 17.1 as the percentage of the speeches with broken ends. I was astounded to see the figure, considering the style in the undoubtedly Shakespearean parts; and I find that, on my method, in Acts III., IV., V. the percentage is about 71, in the first two Acts (which show very slight, if any, traces of Shakespeare's hand) about 19. I cannot imagine the origin of the mistake here.] [Footnote 287: I put the matter thus, instead of saying that, with a run-on line, one does pass to the next line without any pause, because, in common with many others, I should not in any case whatever _wholly_ ignore the fact that one line ends and another begins.] [Footnote 288: These overflows are what Koenig calls 'schroffe Enjambements,' which he considers to correspond with Furnivall's 'run-on lines.'] [Footnote 289: The number of light endings, however, in _Julius Caesar_ (10) and _All'
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409  
410   411   412   413   >>  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Shakespeare

 

percentage

 
endings
 

number

 
Macbeth
 

Koenig

 
significant
 

performed

 
mistake

slight

 
Pericles
 
Shakespearean
 
figure
 

undoubtedly

 
astounded
 

method

 

speeches

 

broken

 
traces

overflows

 

schroffe

 
Enjambements
 

ignore

 

begins

 

considers

 

Julius

 

Caesar

 

correspond

 

Furnivall


wholly

 

matter

 

origin

 
imagine
 

common

 

marked

 
confirms
 

impression

 
strongly
 

shorter


preceding

 
figures
 

Othello

 
practically
 

visible

 

tendency

 
transition
 

difference

 

reckonings

 

source