FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167  
168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   >>   >|  
e scholars received orders ... to enlarge somewhat on the Papacy which _they_ did, and thereupon transmitted _their_ criticism to the Elector and the princes." (Kolde, _Anal.,_ 297.) This is corroborated by Melanchthon himself, who wrote to Camerarius, March 1, 1537: "We received orders (_iussi sumus_) to write something on the Primacy of Peter or the Roman Pontiff." (_C. R._ 3, 292.) February 17 Osiander reported: "The first business imposed on _us_ by the princes was ... diligently to explain the Primacy which was omitted from the Confession because it was regarded as odious. The latter of these duties _we_ have to-day completed, so that _we_ shall immediately deliver a copy to the princes." (3, 267.) These statements might even warrant the conclusion that the theologians also participated, more or less in the drawing up of the Tract, for which however, further evidence is wanting. Nor does it appear how this view could be harmonized with Veit Dietrich's assertion in his letter to Foerster, May 16: "Orders were given to write about the power of the Pope the primacy of Peter, and the ecclesiastical jurisdiction. Philip alone performed this very well." (3, 370.) However, entirely apart from the statement of Osiander, the mere fact that the theologians were ordered to prepare the document, and that it was delivered by and in the name of these theologians, sufficiently warrants us to speak of the document as "The Tract of the Scholars at Smalcald" with the same propriety that, for example, the opinion which Melanchthon drew up on August 6, 1536, is entitled: "The First Proposal of the Wittenberg Scholars concerning the Future Council." (_C. R._ 3, 119.) VIII. Luther's Efforts at Restoring Catechetical Instruction. 81. Modern Researches Respecting Luther's Catechisms. Besides G. v. Zezschwitz (_System der christlichkirchlichen Katechetik,_ 3 volumes, 1862 to 1874) and numerous other contemporary and later students, G. Buchwald, F. Cohrs, and O. Albrecht have, since the middle of the past century, rendered no mean service by their researches pertaining to Luther's Catechisms. Buchwald edited the three series of sermons on the Five Chief Parts which Luther delivered in 1528, pointed out their important bearing on his Catechisms, and shed new light on their origin by discovering and exploiting the Stephan Roth correspondence. He published the results of his labors in 1894 under the title, "The Origin of the Two Catechi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167  
168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Luther
 

princes

 

Catechisms

 
theologians
 
Osiander
 
Buchwald
 

Primacy

 

document

 

Melanchthon

 

Scholars


orders
 
delivered
 

received

 

System

 

warrants

 

Smalcald

 

Modern

 

Zezschwitz

 

Respecting

 

prepare


Besides
 

sufficiently

 

Researches

 
Instruction
 

entitled

 
Future
 
Proposal
 

ordered

 

Council

 

Restoring


Catechetical

 

Wittenberg

 
opinion
 
Efforts
 

August

 
propriety
 

origin

 

discovering

 

bearing

 

important


pointed

 

exploiting

 
Stephan
 

Origin

 
Catechi
 
labors
 

correspondence

 

published

 
results
 

sermons