FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147  
148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   >>   >|  
Stoic hands and then into those of Antiochus. _Adeptum esse omnia_: put rather differently in _D.F._ V. 24, 26, cf. also _D.F._ II. 33, 34, _Ac._ II. 131. _Et animo et corpore et vita_: this is the [Greek: trias] or [Greek: trilogia ton agathon], which belongs in this form to late Peripateticism (cf. _M.D.F._ III. 43), the third division is a development from the [Greek: bios teleios] of Aristotle. The [Greek: trias] in this distinct shape is foreign both to Plato and Arist, though Stobaeus, _Ethica_ II. 6, 4, tries hard to point it out in Plato; Varro seems to merge the two last divisions into one in Aug. _De Civ. Dei_ XIX 3. This agrees better with _D.F._ V. 34--36, cf. also Aug. VIII. 8. On the Antiochean _finis_ see more in note on 22. _Corporis alia_: for ellipse of _bona_, see n. on 13. _Ponebant esse_: n. on 36. _In toto in partibus_: the same distinction is in Stob. _Eth._ II. 6, 7; cf. also _D.F._ V. 35. _Pulchritudinem_: Cic. _Orator_ 160, puts the spelling _pulcher_ beyond a doubt; it often appears in inscr. of the Republic. On the other hand only _pulcrai_, _pulcrum_, etc., occur in inscr., exc. _pulchre_, which is found once (_Corp. Inscr._ I. no 1019). _Sepulchrum_, however, is frequent at an early time. On the tendency to aspirate even native Latin words see Boscher in Curtius' _Studien_ II. 1, p. 145. In the case of _pulcher_ the false derivation from [Greek: polychroos] may have aided the corruption. Similarly in modern times J.C. Scaliger derived it from [Greek: poly cheir] (Curtius' _Grundz_ ed. 3, p. 8) For _valetudinem viris pulchritudinem_, cf. the [Greek: hygieia ischys kallos] of Stob. _Eth_. II. 6, 7, and _T.D._ V. 22. _Sensus integros_ [Greek: euaisthesia] in Stob., cf. also _D.F._ V. 36 (_in sensibus est sua cuiusque virtus_). _Celeritatem_: so [Greek: podokeia] in Stob., _bene currere_ in Aug. XIX. 3. _Claritatem in voce_: cf. _De Off._ I. 133. _Impressionem_: al. _expressionem_. For the former cf. _De Or._ III. 185, which will show the meaning to be the distinct marking of each sound; for the latter _De Or._ III. 41, which will disprove Klotz's remark "_imprimit lingua voces, non exprimit_." See also _De Off._ I. 133. One old ed. has _pressionem_, which, though not itself Ciceronian, recalls _presse loqui_, and _N.D._ II. 149. Pliny, _Panegyric_, c. 64, has _expressit explanavitque verba_; he and Quintilian often so use _exprimere_. Sec.20. _Ingeniis_: rejected by many (so Halm), but cf. _T.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147  
148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

distinct

 

pulcher

 

Curtius

 
sensibus
 
valetudinem
 

euaisthesia

 

Ingeniis

 

Grundz

 

pulchritudinem

 

rejected


hygieia

 

kallos

 

Sensus

 
integros
 
exprimere
 

ischys

 
Quintilian
 

derived

 

Studien

 
native

Boscher

 

derivation

 

modern

 

Scaliger

 

Similarly

 

corruption

 
polychroos
 

cuiusque

 

marking

 
Ciceronian

meaning

 

disprove

 
exprimit
 

lingua

 
imprimit
 

pressionem

 

remark

 

recalls

 

podokeia

 

currere


expressit

 

Celeritatem

 

virtus

 

explanavitque

 

Panegyric

 
Claritatem
 
presse
 

expressionem

 

Impressionem

 
Republic