FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160  
161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   >>   >|  
d over Plato's opinions with a much more cautious step. Sec.31. _Sensus omnis hebetes_: this stands in contradiction to the whole Antiochean view as given in II. 12--64, cf. esp. 19 _sensibus quorum ita clara et certa iudicia sunt_, etc.: Antiochus would probably defend his agreement with Plato by asserting that though sense is naturally dull, reason may sift out the certain from the uncertain. _Res eas ... quae essent aut ita_: Halm by following his pet MS. without regard to the meaning of Cic. has greatly increased the difficulty of the passage. He reads _res ullas ... quod aut ita essent_; thus making Antiochus assert that _no_ true information can be got from sensation, whereas, as we shall see in the _Lucullus_, he really divided sensations into true and false. I believe that we have a mixture here of Antiochus' real view with Cicero's reminiscences of the _Theaetetus_ and of Xenocrates; see below. _Nec percipere_: for this see _Lucullus_ passim. Christ's conj. _percipi, quod perceptio sit mentis non sensuum_, which Halm seems to approve, is a wanton corruption of the text, cf. II. 101 _neget rem ullam percipi posse sensibus_, so 21, 119 (just like _ratione percipi_ 91), also I. 41 _sensu comprehensum_. _Subiectae sensibus_: cf. II. 74 and Sext. Emp. _Adv. Math._ VIII. 9, [Greek: ta hypopiptonta te aisthesei]. _Aut ita mobiles_, etc.: this strongly reminds one of the _Theaetetus_, esp. 160 D sq. For _constans_ cf. [Greek: estekos], which so often occurs there and in the _Sophistes_. _Ne idem_: Manut. for MSS. _eidem_. In the _Theaetetus_, Heraclitus' theory of flux is carried to such an extent as to destroy the self-identity of things; even the word [Greek: eme] is stated to be an absurdity, since it implies a permanent subject, whereas the subject is changing from moment to moment; the expression therefore ought to be [Greek: tous eme]. _Continenter_: [Greek: ounechos]; cf. Simplicius quoted in Grote's Plato, I. p. 37, about Heraclitus, [Greek: en metabole gar synechei ta onta]. _Laberentur et fluerent_: cf. the phrases [Greek: rhoe, panta rhei, hoion rheumata kineisthai ta panta], etc., which are scattered thickly over the _Theaet._ and the ancient texts about Heraclitus; also a very similar passage in _Orator_ 10. _Opinabilem_: [Greek: doxasten], so _opinabile_ = [Greek: doxaston] in Cic. _Tim_ ch. II. The term was largely used by Xenocrates (R. and P. 243--247), Arist. too distinguishes between the [Greek: doxa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160  
161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

sensibus

 

Antiochus

 

Heraclitus

 

percipi

 

Theaetetus

 

essent

 
Xenocrates
 

subject

 

passage

 

Lucullus


moment

 

carried

 
extent
 

absurdity

 

implies

 

permanent

 

stated

 
theory
 
identity
 

things


destroy

 
strongly
 

mobiles

 
reminds
 
aisthesei
 

hypopiptonta

 

Sophistes

 

estekos

 
constans
 

occurs


Continenter

 

opinabile

 

doxasten

 

doxaston

 

Opinabilem

 

ancient

 

similar

 

Orator

 

distinguishes

 
largely

Theaet

 
thickly
 

quoted

 

Simplicius

 
ounechos
 

expression

 

metabole

 

rheumata

 
kineisthai
 

scattered