FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265  
1266   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   >>   >|  
lly in the conditions that prevail in New York, a disproportionate number of manual workers. A fair application of literacy, intelligence and other tests would hardly act with proportional equality on all levels of life. The most that the evidence does is to raise, rather than answer, the question whether there was an unlawful disproportionate representation of lower income groups on the special jury."[1215] Then, as to the due process clause, he pointed out that the jury had had a long and varied history in the course of which it has assumed many forms, and that for that matter the Court "* * * has construed it to be inherent in the independent concept of due process that condemnation shall be rendered only after a trial, in which the hearing is a real one, not a sham or pretense. * * * Trial must be held before a tribunal not biased by interest in the event. * * * Undoubtedly a system of exclusions could be so manipulated as to call a jury before which defendants would have so little chance of a decision on the evidence that it would constitute a denial of due process. A verdict on the evidence, however, is all an accused can claim; he is not entitled to a set-up that will give a chance of escape after he is properly proven guilty. Society also has a right to a fair trial. The defendant's right is a neutral jury. He has no constitutional right to friends on the jury."[1216] APPORTIONMENT OF REPRESENTATION Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State. In General The effect of this section in relation to Negroes was indicated in Elk _v._ Wilkins.[1217] "Slavery having been abolished, and the persons formerly held as slaves made cit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265  
1266   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

number

 

process

 
States
 

evidence

 

citizens

 

persons

 

representation

 
United
 

President

 

twenty


Representatives

 

disproportionate

 

chance

 

defendant

 
constitutional
 

friends

 

neutral

 

respective

 

counting

 

numbers


apportioned

 

REPRESENTATION

 
APPORTIONMENT
 
Indians
 
Section
 

excluding

 
inhabitants
 

relation

 
Negroes
 
section

General
 

effect

 
Wilkins
 
slaves
 

abolished

 

Slavery

 
proportion
 
reduced
 

officers

 
members

Legislature

 

thereof

 

Judicial

 

Executive

 

choice

 

electors

 
Congress
 

denied

 
Society
 

rebellion