1913).
[292] United States _v._ Chandler-Dunbar Co., 229 U.S. 53 (1913).
[293] United States _v._ Willow River Power Co., 324 U.S. 499 (1945).
[294] United States _v._ Appalachian Electric Power Co., 311 U.S. 377,
427 (1940).
[295] United States _v._ Lynah, 188 U.S. 445 (1903). _See also_ Jacobs
_v._ United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933).
[296] United States _v._ Cress, 243 U.S. 316, 328, 329 (1917).
[297] United States _v._ Dickinson, 331 U.S. 745 (1947).
[298] United States _v._ Kansas City Ins. Co., 339 U.S. 799 (1950).
[299] United States _v._ Cress, 243 U.S. 316 (1917).
[300] Horstmann Co. _v._ United States, 257 U.S. 138 (1921).
[301] Bauman _v._ Ross, 167 U.S. 548 (1897); Sharp _v._ United States,
191 U.S. 341, 351-352, 354 (1903).
[302] United States _v._ Welch, 217 U.S. 333 (1910).
[303] Bauman _v._ Ross, 167 U.S. 548 (1897).
[304] Monongahela Nav. Co. _v._ United States, 148 U.S. 312, 326 (1893).
[305] Reichelderfer _v._ Quinn, 287 U.S. 315, 318 (1932).
[306] Sharp _v._ United States, 191 U.S. 341 (1903).
[307] Monongahela Nav. Co. _v._ United States, 148 U.S. 312, 326 (1893).
[308] United States ex rel. T.V.A. _v._ Powelson, 319 U.S. 266, 281
(1943); United States _v._ Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 375 (1943).
[309] United States ex rel. T.V.A. _v._ Powelson, 319 U.S. 266, 275
(1943); United States _v._ New River Collieries Co., 262 U.S. 341
(1923).
[310] United States _v._ Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 374 (1943). _See also_
Olson _v._ United States, 292 U.S. 246 (1934). _Cf._ Kimball Laundry Co.
_v._ United States, 338 U.S. 1 (1949).
[311] Boom Co. _v._ Patterson, 98 U.S. 403 (1879); McCandless _v._
United States, 298 U.S. 342 (1936).
[312] United States _v._ Chandler-Dunbar Co., 229 U.S. 53 (1913).
[313] United States _v._ John J. Felin & Co., 334 U.S. 624 (1948).
[314] United States _v._ Commodities Trading Corp., 339 U.S. 121 (1950).
[315] United States _v._ Cors, 337 U.S. 325, 333 (1949). In United
States _v._ Toronto Nav Co., 338 U.S. 396 (1949) the Court reversed a
decision of the Court of Claims which based an award for an obsolete
Great Lakes car ferry in part on a capitalization of its prior earnings,
and in part on isolated sales of similar vessels used between Florida
and Cuba.
[316] Mitchell _v._ United States, 267 U.S. 341 (1925).
[317] United States _v._ General Motors Corp., 323 U.S. 373, 379 (1945).
[318] Ibid. 382-384.
[319] United States _v._ Petty
|