FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042  
1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   >>   >|  
TS AND CASES APPLICABLE Amendment VII governs only courts which sit under the authority of the United States,[10] including courts in the territories[11] and the District of Columbia.[12] It does not apply to a State court even when it is enforcing a right created by federal statute.[13] Its coverage is "* * * limited to rights and remedies peculiarly legal in their nature, and such as it was proper to assert in courts of law and by the appropriate modes and proceedings of courts of law."[14] The term "common law" is used in contradistinction to suits in which equitable rights alone were recognized at the time of the framing of the amendment and equitable remedies were administered.[15] Hence it does not apply to cases where recovery of money damages is incident to equitable relief even though damages might have been recovered in an action at law.[16] Nor does it apply to cases in admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, in which the trial is by a court without a jury.[17] Nor does it reach statutory proceedings unknown to the common law, such as an application to a court of equity to enforce an order of an administrative body.[18] CASES NOT GOVERNED BY THE AMENDMENT Omission of a jury has been upheld in the following instances on the ground that the suit in question was not a suit at common law within the meaning of the Seventh Amendment; (1) Suits to enforce claims against the United States.[19] (2) Suit authorized by Territorial law against a municipality, based upon a moral obligation only.[20] (3) Suit to cancel a naturalization certificate for fraud.[21] (4) Order of deportation of an alien.[22] (5) Assessment of damages in patent infringement suit.[23] (6) Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act.[24] (7) Jurisdiction of bankruptcy court to examine into reasonableness of fees paid by person for legal services in contemplation of bankruptcy.[25] (8) Final decision of customs appraisers in regard to value of imports.[26] It has been further held that there was no infringement of the constitutional right to trial by jury in the following circumstances: (1) A territorial statute requiring specific answers to special interrogations, in addition to a general verdict.[27] (2) A rule of a District of Columbia court authorizing judgment by default in an action _ex contractu_, on failure to show by affidavit a good defense.[28] (3) A federal court's observance of a State statute ma
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042  
1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

courts

 

statute

 
equitable
 

damages

 

common

 

rights

 

remedies

 
proceedings
 

action

 

bankruptcy


infringement

 

enforce

 

Amendment

 

Columbia

 
federal
 

United

 

States

 

District

 

Harbor

 

Workers


Compensation

 

obligation

 
Jurisdiction
 
deportation
 
naturalization
 

certificate

 
patent
 

Assessment

 
cancel
 
Longshoremen

verdict
 

general

 
authorizing
 
addition
 

interrogations

 

requiring

 
specific
 
answers
 

special

 
judgment

default

 

defense

 

observance

 

affidavit

 

contractu

 

failure

 
territorial
 

circumstances

 
contemplation
 

services