FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048  
1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   >>   >|  
einbach, 127 U.S. 70 (1888). _Cf._ Re Simons, 247 U.S. 231 (1918). [39] Ex parte Skinner & Eddy Corp., 265 U.S. 86, 96 (1924). [40] Vicksburg & M.R. Co. _v._ Putnam, 118 U.S. 545, 553 (1886); United States _v._ Reading Railroad, 123 U.S. 113, 114 (1887). [41] 118 U.S. 545; where are cited Carver _v._ Jackson ex dem. Astor et al., 4 Pet. 1, 80 (1830); Magniac _v._ Thompson, 7 Pet. 348, 390 (1833); Mitchell _v._ Harmony, 13 How. 115, 131 (1852); Transportation Line _v._ Hope, 95 U.S. 297, 302 (1877). [42] Games _v._ Dunn, 14 Pet. 322, 327 (1840). [43] Sparf _v._ United States, 156 U.S. 51, 99-100 (1895); Pleasants _v._ Fant, 22 Wall. 116, 121 (1875); Randall _v._ Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 109 U.S. 478, 482 (1883); Meehan _v._ Valentine, 145 U.S. 611, 625 (1892); Coughran _v._ Bigelow, 164 U.S. 301 (1896). [44] Treat Mfg. Co. _v._ Standard Steel & Iron Co., 157 U.S. 674 (1895); Randall _v._ Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 109 U.S. 478, 482 (1883) and cases there cited. [45] Capital Traction Co. _v._ Hof, 174 U.S. 1, 13 (1899). [46] Arkansas Land & Cattle Co. _v._ Mann, 130 U.S. 69, 74 (1889). [47] Dimick _v._ Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474, 476-478 (1935). [48] 228 U.S. 364 (1913). [49] _See_ Austin Wakeman Scott, Fundamentals of Procedure in Actions at Law (1922), 103 and articles there cited. [50] Baltimore & C. Line _v._ Redman, 295 U.S. 654 (1935). [51] Ibid. 661. [52] Lyon _v._ Mutual Benefit Assn., 305 U.S. 484 (1939). [53] 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 724. [54] Galloway _v._ United States, 319 U.S. 372 (1943). [55] Ibid. 397. As a matter of fact, the case being a claim against the United States need not have been tried by a jury except for the allowance of Congress. [56] Henderson's Distilled Spirits, 14 Wall. 44, 53 (1872). _See also_ Rogers _v._ United States, 141 U.S. 548, 554 (1891); Parsons _v._ Armor, 3 Pet. 413 (1830); Campbell _v._ Boyreau, 21 How. 223 (1859). [57] Baylis _v._ Travelers' Ins. Co., 113 U.S. 316, 321 (1885), holding it error for a judge, in absence of any waiver, to find the facts and render judgment thereon. [58] Duignan _v._ United States, 274 U.S. 195, 198 (1927), holding jury trial waived by an appearance and participation in the trial without demanding a jury. [59] Hodges _v._ Easton, 106 U.S. 408, 412 (1883). [60] Aetna Insurance Co. _v._ Kennedy, 301 U.S. 389 (1937). [61] _See_ Justices of the Sup. Ct. _v._ United States ex rel. Murray, 9 Wall. 274 (1870); Chi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048  
1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

United

 

States

 
Baltimore
 

holding

 

Randall

 

matter

 

Justices

 
Kennedy
 

Insurance

 

Galloway


Murray

 

Redman

 

articles

 

allowance

 
Mutual
 

Benefit

 

Easton

 

waived

 

appearance

 

Baylis


Travelers

 

absence

 
render
 
judgment
 
thereon
 

waiver

 
Henderson
 

participation

 
Spirits
 
Distilled

Congress
 

Duignan

 
Hodges
 
demanding
 

Campbell

 

Boyreau

 
Parsons
 
Rogers
 

Dimick

 
Magniac

Thompson

 

Carver

 

Jackson

 

Harmony

 

Mitchell

 

Transportation

 
Skinner
 

Simons

 
einbach
 

Reading