FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847  
848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   >>   >|  
le with the comity clause.[183] In Travis _v._ Yale and Towne Mfg. Co.,[184] the Court, while sustaining the right of a State to tax income accruing within its borders to nonresidents,[185] held the particular tax void because it denied to nonresidents exemptions which were allowed to residents. The "terms 'resident' and 'citizen' are not synonymous," wrote Justice Pitney, "* * * but a general taxing scheme * * * if it discriminates against all nonresidents, has the necessary effect of including in the discrimination those who are citizens of other States; * * *"[186] Where there was no discrimination between citizens and noncitizens, a State statute taxing the business of hiring persons within the State for labor outside the State, was sustained.[187] This section of the Constitution does not prevent a territorial government, exercising powers delegated by Congress, from imposing a discriminatory license tax on nonresident fishermen operating within its waters.[188] However, what at first glance may appear to be a discrimination may turn out not to be when the entire system of taxation prevailing in the enacting State is considered. On the basis of over-all fairness, the Court sustained a Connecticut statute which required nonresident stockholders to pay a State tax measured by the full market value of their stock, while resident stockholders were subject to local taxation on the market value of that stock reduced by the value of the real estate owned by the corporation.[189] Occasional or accidental inequality to a nonresident taxpayer are not sufficient to defeat a scheme of taxation whose operation is generally equitable.[190] In an early case the Court brushed aside as frivolous the contention that a State violated this clause by subjecting one of its own citizens to a property tax on a debt due from a nonresident secured by real estate situated where the debtor resided.[191] Clause 2. A person charged in any State With Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime. Fugitives From Justice DUTY TO SURRENDER Although this provision is not in its nature self-executing, and there is no express grant to Congress of power to carry it into effect, that body passed a law shortly after the Constitution was adop
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847  
848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

nonresident

 

citizens

 
discrimination
 

nonresidents

 

Justice

 

taxation

 

effect

 
taxing
 

scheme

 

Congress


estate

 

sustained

 

stockholders

 

Constitution

 
statute
 

market

 

resident

 

clause

 

equitable

 

generally


operation

 

defeat

 
frivolous
 
executing
 
brushed
 

express

 
sufficient
 

inequality

 
reduced
 
subject

shortly
 

passed

 
accidental
 
contention
 

taxpayer

 

Occasional

 
corporation
 
nature
 

removed

 
Jurisdiction

Fugitives

 

person

 

charged

 

Treason

 

Authority

 

Demand

 
Felony
 

delivered

 
property
 

Although