FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013  
1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   >>   >|  
zens, as such, to vote, is an existing right. Mr. Richard Grant White, in his late work on "Words and their Uses," says of the word citizen: A citizen is a person who has certain political rights, and the word is properly used to imply or suggest the possession of these rights. Mr. Justice Washington, in the case of Corfield _vs._ Coryell (4 Wash. C. C. Rep. 380), speaking of the "privileges and immunities" of the citizen, as mentioned in Sec. 2, Art. 4, of the Constitution, after enumerating the personal rights mentioned above, and some others, as embraced by those terms, says, To which may be added the elective franchise, as regulated and established by the laws or constitution of the State in which it is to be exercised. At that time the States had entire control of the subject, and could abridge this privilege of the citizen at its pleasure; but the judge recognizes the "elective franchise" as among the "privileges and immunities" secured, to a qualified extent, to the citizens of every State by the provisions of the Constitution last referred to. When, therefore, the States were, by the XIV. Amendment, absolutely prohibited from abridging the privileges of the citizen, either by enforcing existing laws, or by the making of new laws, the right of every "citizen" to the full exercise of this privilege, as against State action, was absolutely secured. Chancellor Kent and Judge Story both refer to the opinion of Mr. Justice Washington, above quoted, with approbation. The Supreme Court of Kentucky, in the case of Amy, a woman of color, _vs._ Smith (1 Littell's Rep. 326), discussed with great ability the questions as to what constituted citizenship, and what were the "privileges and immunities of citizens" which were secured by Sec. 2, Art. 4, of the Constitution, and they showed, by an unanswerable argument, that the term "citizens," as there used, was confined to those who were entitled to the enjoyment of the elective franchise, and that that was among the highest of the "privileges and immunities" secured to the citizen by that section. The court say that, To be a citizen it is necessary that he should be entitled to the enjoyment of these privileges and immunities, upon th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013  
1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

citizen

 

privileges

 
immunities
 

secured

 

franchise

 

Constitution

 

elective

 

rights

 

citizens

 

privilege


absolutely

 

States

 

mentioned

 

existing

 

entitled

 

Justice

 
Washington
 

enjoyment

 

Chancellor

 

making


abridging

 

prohibited

 

Amendment

 

exercise

 
enforcing
 

section

 

action

 
confined
 

Littell

 
citizenship

constituted
 
discussed
 

questions

 

approbation

 

ability

 

highest

 

quoted

 
Supreme
 
unanswerable
 

showed


Kentucky

 
argument
 
opinion
 

suggest

 

properly

 

political

 
possession
 

Corfield

 

enumerating

 

speaking